The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Recommendation on screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care for individuals not known to be at high risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.201967 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ainsley Moore, Gregory Traversy, Donna L Reynolds, John J Riva, Guylène Thériault, Brenda J Wilson, Melissa Subnath, Brett D Thombs |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 13 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 28% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#329,048
of 26,436,676 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#584
of 9,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,475
of 459,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#18
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,436,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.