| Title |
Canada’s response to the initial 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison with peer countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.220316 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fahad Razak, Saeha Shin, C. David Naylor, Arthur S. Slutsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 828 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 317 | 38% |
| United States | 61 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Japan | 7 | <1% |
| Thailand | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Djibouti | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 2% |
| Unknown | 400 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 695 | 84% |
| Scientists | 67 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 50 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 903. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#19,745
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#27
of 9,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#666
of 447,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.