↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 7,892)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
4144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5895 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2006
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.051351
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. E.R. Warburton

Abstract

The primary purpose of this narrative review was to evaluate the current literature and to provide further insight into the role physical inactivity plays in the development of chronic disease and premature death. We confirm that there is irrefutable evidence of the effectiveness of regular physical activity in the primary and secondary prevention of several chronic diseases (e.g., cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, hypertension, obesity, depression and osteoporosis) and premature death. We also reveal that the current Health Canada physical activity guidelines are sufficient to elicit health benefits, especially in previously sedentary people. There appears to be a linear relation between physical activity and health status, such that a further increase in physical activity and fitness will lead to additional improvements in health status.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 284 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,895 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 29 <1%
United Kingdom 23 <1%
Canada 18 <1%
Brazil 13 <1%
Spain 12 <1%
Portugal 7 <1%
Malaysia 5 <1%
Australia 5 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Other 46 <1%
Unknown 5732 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1472 25%
Student > Master 1163 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 710 12%
Researcher 466 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 316 5%
Other 976 17%
Unknown 792 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1190 20%
Sports and Recreations 1111 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 533 9%
Psychology 440 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 357 6%
Other 1229 21%
Unknown 1035 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 975. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#10,000
of 19,190,141 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#17
of 7,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50
of 199,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,190,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.