| Title |
The consequences of son preference and sex-selective abortion in China and other Asian countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.101368 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Therese Hesketh, Li Lu, Zhu Wei Xing |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 23% |
| Canada | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 57 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 92 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 13% |
| Psychology | 15 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 449. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#63,047
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#118
of 9,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152
of 120,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.