@EzekielPhenix @SanguineMarking @StatisticUrban https://t.co/FaBYi42LK6 This article does a decent job outlining some of its functions.
I would never be able to compare the pleasure of having an erected penis with my foreskin intact and without it. The end of the foreskin, is loaded with nerve endings that are stimulated by motion during intercourse or masturbation. https://t.co/kHKcbRRE
@two_way_radio @imr0tting @penisdoom https://t.co/cf3SdPg7h7 https://t.co/s7d6Ygd4Wn https://t.co/ISeOjcVmJS https://t.co/i9Z9619Gl5 https://t.co/FV2OWcLcaF most of the benefits coming from circumcision (hygiene, treating phimosis) can be attained thr
@Z_Aliways Cut_was lions have foreskin so stop spreading Al Taqqiya . https://t.co/YnNZ4illbh.
@its__socrates Every mammal has a foreskin. Only humans sat and thought that theirs served no importance 🤔 beats logic Here's an ncbi publication https://t.co/EjgLYqU8yW.
@Peonichka @gwenywere всего три пункта и второй указывается как “редкость“. какую инфу предоставила в аргументации – по такой и сужу) https://t.co/R0WefYtnKJ https://t.co/fmXXpiQDnB
@panitard Si quieres empezar a ver que no existe dicho consenso, empieza por aca (es viejo pero da muchas luces): https://t.co/mIrzqfrDaC
Google is now completely tailored to favor circumcision. Parents who search "circumcision" in an effort to research, will see nothing but pro circumcision and anti foreskin links and articles. Like this one that calls foreskin "vestigial." @intactamerica
@didier_nv @USMC___ @YouMayCallMeV1 @stillgray @LarryDJonesJr I mean medline plus isn't a "news article." It's a medical article. And we do things we didn't evolve to do all the time. And the evolutionary purpose and advantage is itself debatable: https://
@niconyco4real @BuenoForMiami Apologies, thought you were adding about health benefits of being cut, as that is most common. https://t.co/vrx48nd5Q4.
@MarrytheMiddle @PlayingRetr0 @DerEisen_Wolf @againstgrmrs @GovRonDeSantis Actually there is Take a read of this https://t.co/mr9uqN4SCL
@Notgoingsane @Krautritter @Akaruise @stone_toss Its not just excess skin. it does not help with Hygiene its the other way around infact. just cause its been practiced for thousands years doesnt make it a good thing. https://t.co/ztpzmlxcuj Read a book.
@Dogstarious @Momberly89 @Elmoish1 Do you bother actually looking into these things before saying it? https://t.co/aYwp6uo13t.
@JorgeTo12370183 @raycontrerasr https://t.co/qwL4oH9Iw3 Puede , puede y puede, y finalmente, la decisión no se la dan a la persona, se le hace cuando es un bebé.
@JorgeTo12370183 @raycontrerasr Y por último, fuentes, fuentes , fuentes. Por algo nacemos con él. https://t.co/qwL4oH9Iw3 https://t.co/4Dd5yiYPAZ. https://t.co/O8nJsAzZWB
@SandraDuffy123 @MaleHeathWatch @nikki_plora @TheTNHoller @TenDownMusk Circumcision isn't the removal of the penis (mutilation) without the parents' consent. It's the removal of foreskin. https://t.co/ogJTnMKTJQ
ويمكن أن تقلل القلفة المتحركة بشكل كبير من الحاجة إلى التزليق ، وتقلل من انزعاج الشريك أثناء ممارسة الجنس المخترق . https://t.co/SVLm3NOI0f
@greg93939393 @PerseusAttroix @YSufferer @s4m31p4n Lmao wild that this is discourse. I'm not arguing for or against circumcision, but it's a fact that the foreskin serves no biological role as testes do https://t.co/3M3uF3RgSN "'There are no health benefit
Here is an article that might provide insight: https://t.co/C2aaCd0cDW
@Butterrespecter @rising_serpent There's science as well as culture/religion favoring circumcision. https://t.co/NKpXno6zR7; https://t.co/sA43LhcBX5; https://t.co/G2f3ObYRSe
@DawnaCa57444318 @KenGWalter1 Literally professionals are disagreeing with you, but wallow in your cognitive dissonance. https://t.co/rd14Z2tnpa
@End_MGM_FGM_IGM @MaimedMann Some scientists even argue that the prepuce is, itself, vestigial. There's a debate on this in the field. https://t.co/rd14Z2sPzC.
RT @Lizzy_Lang7: @TheTweetOfRhea I'm against it. It should be a choice made by an adult not something decided for a BABY. It's a disgusting…
RT @Lizzy_Lang7: @TheTweetOfRhea I'm against it. It should be a choice made by an adult not something decided for a BABY. It's a disgusting…
RT @Lizzy_Lang7: @TheTweetOfRhea I'm against it. It should be a choice made by an adult not something decided for a BABY. It's a disgusting…
Me trying to understand the illustration https://t.co/eubMhKVsxb
RT @Lizzy_Lang7: @TheTweetOfRhea I'm against it. It should be a choice made by an adult not something decided for a BABY. It's a disgusting…
RT @Lizzy_Lang7: @TheTweetOfRhea I'm against it. It should be a choice made by an adult not something decided for a BABY. It's a disgusting…
RT @Lizzy_Lang7: @TheTweetOfRhea I'm against it. It should be a choice made by an adult not something decided for a BABY. It's a disgusting…
@LoisFairgate @TheTweetOfRhea That is actually untrue https://t.co/dra8a5dtRm
@syd_gary @ReliefBelief @TheTweetOfRhea It does not. The foreskin is the most sensitive part. https://t.co/dra8a5dtRm
@TheTweetOfRhea I'm against it. It should be a choice made by an adult not something decided for a BABY. It's a disgusting practice. It does more harm than good. Only in VERY RARE instances is it medical necessary. Otherwise, leave it alone. https://t.co/
@quill_monger @mutilation_surv @rawmilkhoney The Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://t.co/qko41lpWFj
@Leophilius Actually as of yet the jury is out on that one https://t.co/v4is6Ik1lt.
@JohnyKeats @nabookire @schcyn “Every mammal has a foreskin,” says Dr. George Denniston, Many people don’t understand the value of the foreskin,” https://t.co/vhb8DtojtL.
@TheStooge5 @ZackTaylorFA @jazzgrackle Tell me you know nothing about male anatomy without telling me you know nothing about male anatomy https://t.co/8JL4gG6auU https://t.co/qdTKyx54PT
HTF: HOW THE FUCK... DID RELIGION CONVINCE MALES... TO REMOVE THEIR OWN FORESKIN... WHICH CONTAINS OVER 20,000 NERVE ENDINGS? “The ridged band is important for sexual joy. No one has a right to take that away from someone.” https://t.co/z1ULIOeKhb
@TheLightOfOrion penile foreskin is the primary erogenous tissue in men https://t.co/dSCPtO7jeg
@MalchukReal @adkisojk @Feisty_FL You’ve shown nothing but lies and hysterics. I suggest you read this https://t.co/0Ts8slgrXt
@VioletVampire2 @CriticalOfAll @freep This is a dumb debate. https://t.co/hzG6EKpaTZ
Vital or vestigial? The foreskin has its fans and foes https://t.co/goIxXDlmVS
@TlMrs @gil_gu @t_Hrice @Snufka86 לא ביטלתי. אלא לא הסכמתי. https://t.co/B624ywEIAG https://t.co/jmwnRjsaxM
@7al6ooma @safaabdulla95 @prince_hamo0od If we question science: Currently there are no known health benefits to having foreskin. At all. And there are clear benefits to circumcision. This is why even non religious people do it! References: 1- https://t.
@_shalash__ If we question science... Currently there are no known health benefits to having foreskin. At all. And there are clear benefits to circumcision. This is why even non religious people do it! References: 1- https://t.co/NRa10bOHY9 2- https://t.
@quill_monger @rnikoley Fast-forward several decades, to the 1980s, research suggested neonatal circumcision could reduce urinary tract infections in male infants by a whopping 90% (Pediatrics 1985;75:901–3 and Pediatrics 1986;78:96–9). https://t.co/SJwsLB
@shitgodass @NatashaFatah You can't give out an absolute judgement like that against circumcision when scientists disagree on the usefulness of the foreskin with the balanced tipped against it. Please see: https://t.co/4vpWohFEgF
@grillick @AndrewYang @JellyfishRave Going off the URL this site is clearly biased. Here's an actual medical authority dealing in facts only. https://t.co/5Y0Q1uOtDe
@Neviosx @justagirl_75 @ChrisN82393974 @senko @SarieJoubert1 @AmyMek Ok, that may be, but you're essentially arguing that feeling more sexual pleasure outweighs the benefits of the foreskin's removal. Look, there's still no clear consensus on which way is
@RogerMeow Lots of information out there and nothing final https://t.co/HWvMgPNdtk
@ConservaGrrl @Gregory_Malchuk https://t.co/DWwbmIpFKk Medical literature is proving you wrong, yet you still believe that foreskin is "excess skin". Men with foreskin are proving you wrong. If you had foreskin you'd know that such a claim is ludricrous,