↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

COVID-19 lockdown revisionism

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 9,029)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2363 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor
Title
COVID-19 lockdown revisionism
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2023
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.221543
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blake Murdoch, Timothy Caulfield

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,363 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1013. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,059
of 23,981,346 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#20
of 9,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#396
of 376,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,981,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.