| Title |
Rates and determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy and association with neonatal outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.130499 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandra Legge, Linda Dodds, Noni E. MacDonald, Jeffrey Scott, Shelly McNeil |
| Abstract |
There is growing evidence that seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy has benefits for mother and baby. We determined influenza vaccination rates among pregnant women during the 2 nonpandemic influenza seasons following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, explored maternal factors as predictors of influenza vaccination status and evaluated the association between maternal influenza vaccination and neonatal outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 21% |
| United States | 7 | 15% |
| Australia | 4 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 36% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#417,717
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#732
of 9,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,921
of 320,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#9
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.