↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Rates and determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy and association with neonatal outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
55 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Rates and determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy and association with neonatal outcomes
Published in
CMAJ, January 2014
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.130499
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Legge, L. Dodds, N. E. MacDonald, J. Scott, S. McNeil

Abstract

There is growing evidence that seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy has benefits for mother and baby. We determined influenza vaccination rates among pregnant women during the 2 nonpandemic influenza seasons following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, explored maternal factors as predictors of influenza vaccination status and evaluated the association between maternal influenza vaccination and neonatal outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Unspecified 7 9%
Other 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 43%
Unspecified 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Other 10 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#141,742
of 13,710,537 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#329
of 6,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,367
of 255,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#5
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,710,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.