@2017_nonsense @0karma108 @SenSanders Seed oils are the primary cause. "Although there was no association of total sugars or fructose with type 2 diabetes, sucrose was associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes." https://t.co/MsNUvFC7lM
@aCarnivoreDiet @FoodFirst_Ty The biggest downside of white sugar is probably just the lack of minerals, but sucrose was found to be "associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes" in one study. https://t.co/PFlNxaQJtb
@TamarHaspel @davidmjohns @TheAtlantic 2017 Meta-analysis. Higher intake of sucrose: lower risk of diabetes. But note: «Our confidence in the estimates was limited by evidence of serious inconsistency between studies for total sugars and fructose, and seri
@DanWeb86 @zeitonline Hier hast du eine große Review. Keine Assoziation zwischen Gesamtzuckeraufnahme mit der Nahrung und Diabetesrisiko (aber positive Assoziation mit Getränken). https://t.co/fpvSWLbkRj
@1m4d4m @ethanjweiss Neither, it’s based on evidence. https://t.co/OsYkTLZVTY
@techno_loft @JMOinKY @thechosenberg Sugar consumption does not cause type 2 diabetes. https://t.co/FgWAhwcIqi
@jonsteinsapir @DearBlueEarth @MBBrownSF3 @DrJenGunter There are many studies refuting that - here are a couple: https://t.co/7IFCxoNfOL https://t.co/WhOWlKH3PX https://t.co/4dS494oJ5S
"Il n'y avait aucune association entre les sucres totaux ou le fructose et le diabète de type 2, le saccharose était associé à une diminution du risque de diabète de type 2" https://t.co/p8OY5I0u0O 5/9
@TheCarnivoreLaw @drmatthewnagra @kcisney @WholeFat @AsarCadyn @theproof @TuckerGoodrich Sugar helps prevent type 2 diabetes (https://t.co/PFlNxb7Mvb), satiates you and energizes you, but the one I prefer is the one with the minerals still in it.
@OlivePufa Starting with this. It doesn't support your position and they don't even believe their results are valid. They even say further research will likely invalidate it. 1of2 https://t.co/yFwUKYDwXD
If anyone wants a good laugh. They can read a nice paper here from the German Sugar Association. Straight out of the Coca Cola playbook, science™ shows that sugar just causes diabetes via its Calories. I can't believe folks cite & actually support th
@MacroFour I see you finally learned how to use control + f. Independent of weight gain, unrealistic amounts of sugar are required. https://t.co/kuSaRbeXy6 https://t.co/GERYiRJQhb
Here's a link to the systematic review looking into fructose consumption and incidence of type 2 diabetes https://t.co/ugOftjJ5Wz #mynutriweb #LiverDiseaseNutrition
@nordse @grontwahl Höjt blodsocker (utanför ref. span) är inte ett problem hos friska individer, oavsett vad du stoppar i munnen. Övervikt är den starkaste faktorn (bortser från gener här) för att utveckla diabetes. Socker i sig orsakar inte diabetes.
meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies: #sugar and #type2diabetes risk 🤷🏻♀️Total sugars: No association 🤷🏻♀️Fructose: No association 👍🏻Sucrose (table sugar): Associated with LOWER risk https://t.co/mkmIStyeQf #diabetes #bloodsugar #health #nutri
@ascentovalhalla @NanciGuestRDPhD @Caveman_1975 @CanenePhd @CakeNutrition @ahhite @rustnutrition @Wendi_Irlbeck @StephHfitness @RDValerie @BioLayne @DNSatUofI No, fructose is not uniquely toxic. https://t.co/62bQHUu3ki https://t.co/lXYr3bfCW3 https:/
@ascentovalhalla @CakeNutrition @edgefitnessper1 @Caveman_1975 @CanenePhd @ahhite @rustnutrition @Wendi_Irlbeck @StephHfitness @RDValerie @BioLayne @DNSatUofI He's not a researcher. It is important to look at the evidence, fructose in high amts not diff fr
RT @drjasonfung: Good News! Sugar doesn't cause diabetes, new paper https://t.co/JpK9yoYpZt Except look at the COI - Coke, Kelloggs, Pepsi…
@kwilman @CharSquires @DrAseemMalhotra You can have this instead...https://t.co/IBdpwwcXDj
@kwilman @CharSquires @DrAseemMalhotra Here you go: 1. https://t.co/xr1Bu6VzZv 2. https://t.co/P4JLvByIvL
Übergewicht ist ein Risikofaktor für #Diabetes. Und dafür ist die #Kalorienbilanz entscheidend, kein einzelner Nährstoff. Das zeigt auch die Forschung. Einen Zusammenhang zwischen der Aufnahme von #Haushaltszucker und einem #Diabetesrisiko gibt es nicht. h
@dnunan79 The question is just whether added fructose per se is concordant with the findings for sweetened drinks. Added sugar per se very low quality evidence, sugary drinks just low quality, so better evidence than meat, and they provide no recommendatio
@woody20005 @IanCramer https://t.co/mOAsOnQqw2 https://t.co/5MNzfBSzoj Plenty educated this side.
@rebeccawatson A good review article about sugar intake and diabetes risk... the science is still working this one out! Eat healthy! Exercise! Meta analysis showing limited effect: https://t.co/aGUaUR87AU Review article making the case for sugar as a ca
RT @cjsnowdon: Meta-analysis of 15 prospective studies found no association between sugar and diabetes, with sucrose being associated with…
RT @cjsnowdon: Meta-analysis of 15 prospective studies found no association between sugar and diabetes, with sucrose being associated with…
RT @cjsnowdon: Meta-analysis of 15 prospective studies found no association between sugar and diabetes, with sucrose being associated with…
RT @cjsnowdon: Meta-analysis of 15 prospective studies found no association between sugar and diabetes, with sucrose being associated with…
RT @cjsnowdon: Meta-analysis of 15 prospective studies found no association between sugar and diabetes, with sucrose being associated with…
Meta-analysis of 15 prospective studies found no association between sugar and diabetes, with sucrose being associated with a lower risk. Science can be so unfashionable. https://t.co/REBEXCMRlu https://t.co/G3gPS3MlXp
@fightitnow @TheBondFreak @CBRooooney @whsource @joerogan @garytaubes I read his book. In which he says he presents only the "anti" case. As for the contrary case, https://t.co/D2Vu4xnWA9. "Current evidence does not allow us to conclude that fructose-cont
@Ard1Toro @SinAzucarOrg @PaulaPancorboPa Es que yo lo que veo es que la gente tiene muy claro que el azúcar es igual a diabetes. Cuando eso es un simplismo absoluto completamente FALSO. https://t.co/BoZQGEQvQH https://t.co/k1m2zb5VP6
@sky7i @lowcarbGP @usambcuba @fgodlee @bmj_latest @DrAseemMalhotra @DiabetesUK @Diabetescouk @garytaubes Alexandra Jenkins is David Jenkins wife. Seivenpiper's wife works for Unilever https://t.co/Edj6HVEKAq
@Gearoidmuar @whsource I haven't seen 20 year studies, but this meta analysis included a number of studies lasting 10-12 years and found no association between sugar and increased diabetes risk: https://t.co/y5Tpg4mvfR If longer, contradictory studies exi
RT @JacobGudiol: Alla vet ju att socker är den enskilt största orsaken till att människor får diabetes typ 2 😉 Mer seriöst: Högre sockerin…
RT @DrJonGerrard: Recent research published in the CMAJ fails to find a link between sugar consumption and type 2 diabetes. https://t.co/s…
RT @DrJonGerrard: Recent research published in the CMAJ fails to find a link between sugar consumption and type 2 diabetes. https://t.co/s…
RT @DrJonGerrard: Recent research published in the CMAJ fails to find a link between sugar consumption and type 2 diabetes. https://t.co/s…
RT @DrJonGerrard: Recent research published in the CMAJ fails to find a link between sugar consumption and type 2 diabetes. https://t.co/s…
“Liberal research” 👀 https://t.co/D4TGWg1O3r
Recent research published in the CMAJ fails to find a link between sugar consumption and type 2 diabetes. https://t.co/s3dMP7xCHB Research is consistent with Liberal research showing risk of type 2 diabetes is more than just sugar consumption. https://t
Revisión estudios cohortes, no encontró relación entre ⬆️glucosa y fructosa➡️⬆️DM2 Recordad, correlacion~causalidad https://t.co/9HUrZrRGtJ https://t.co/G5xBwccK4m
Alla vet ju att socker är den enskilt största orsaken till att människor får diabetes typ 2 😉 Mer seriöst: Högre sockerintag per capita korrelerar med mer diabetes globalt sett https://t.co/qnjDGkwA80 Men inte när man tittar på självrapporterat intag htt
RT @drjkahn: Do Coke and Pepsi drinkers get DM type 2 because of their unhealthy lifestyle? Sugar not correlated, huge study https://t.co/B…
@GreenPlusAnE Read this...may be the company Coke keeps But NO fan of sugar for sure. https://t.co/BbyWkINGpR
Do Coke and Pepsi drinkers get DM type 2 because of their unhealthy lifestyle? Sugar not correlated, huge study https://t.co/BbyWkINGpR
Fat not sugar cause type 2 diabetes! https://t.co/Y1ODu2FJws
Conflict of interest.. some members connected to coke & pepsi Hence sugars are "pardoned" @dlifein https://t.co/vZsZgYwAd9
Sugar/Type 2diabetes. Not related in large new analysis. Animal fat and processed food is the major cause @wthfilm https://t.co/BbyWkINGpR
RT @Zia_Julia: I used 2 be on "sugar=EVIL" bandwagon. Classic mistake: worked 4 me, hence must be true. Evidence not yet there https://t.co…
I used 2 be on "sugar=EVIL" bandwagon. Classic mistake: worked 4 me, hence must be true. Evidence not yet there https://t.co/6Wv8kZwOWX
@FITrebelde 2/limitas consumo en T2D cuando yo leo esto: https://t.co/ekCv41tBAr https://t.co/7v5AGCVyJp
Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose #diabetestype2 #bloodsugar #insulinresistance https://t.co/186ezZRz0d https://t.co/2teiO8ySiy
RT @keto_live: @FructoseNo @gillespi Incredible - the conflict of interest statements on JL Sievenpiper Studies read like the "who is who"…
RT @FructoseNo: Exactly. Every time Sievenpiper quoted you can go to this list of conflicts. Same message every time. Sugar not to blame. :…
Exactly. Every time Sievenpiper quoted you can go to this list of conflicts. Same message every time. Sugar not to blame. :( https://t.co/cRrSYbrpQn
RT @keto_live: @FructoseNo @gillespi Incredible - the conflict of interest statements on JL Sievenpiper Studies read like the "who is who"…
RT @keto_live: @FructoseNo @gillespi Incredible - the conflict of interest statements on JL Sievenpiper Studies read like the "who is who"…
RT @keto_live: @FructoseNo @gillespi Incredible - the conflict of interest statements on JL Sievenpiper Studies read like the "who is who"…
@FructoseNo @gillespi Incredible - the conflict of interest statements on JL Sievenpiper Studies read like the "who is who" of big food: https://t.co/tPRo9aL6In https://t.co/dKauPBQ89I
Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 #diabetestype2 #bloodsugar #insulinresistance https://t.co/tL46PA1yFq
@Jo_Lofty @Moenchpfanner However, anecdotes are not strong science. For reviews see https://t.co/WtQxEe5COq on diabetes and https://t.co/opfZuMT2yX on CVD.
RT @SamueleMarcora: Clearly there is no strong positive association between sugar and type 2 diabetes. Other factors more important https:/…
@EstebanDL @RubenMurciaPrie @fanta Azúcar factor poco importante para diabetes II..PAGA Coca-Cola, Kelloggs, pasta Barilla..etc https://t.co/MRGkuiUeiT https://t.co/plj05QW5rk
RT @juanjo235929: Segun Coca-cola, kellogg's, Pasta Barilla ,etc: "poca relación entre consumo de azúcar y la diabetes tipo II"💲➕👩🔬=💩 http…
Intereses económicos... 💸 https://t.co/NiX1XbDMEr
RT @juanjo235929: Segun Coca-cola, kellogg's, Pasta Barilla ,etc: "poca relación entre consumo de azúcar y la diabetes tipo II"💲➕👩🔬=💩 http…
RT @juanjo235929: Segun Coca-cola, kellogg's, Pasta Barilla ,etc: "poca relación entre consumo de azúcar y la diabetes tipo II"💲➕👩🔬=💩 http…
"Sucrose was associated with a decreased risk of Type 2 Diabetes" (Study has 1 of the biggest lists of 'competing interests' I've ever seen) https://t.co/mRQfrhEqmH
Clearly but I have yet to meet anyone who's diabetic marks decreased when they increased their sugar intake. https://t.co/IZrazky0wO
RT @juanjo235929: Segun Coca-cola, kellogg's, Pasta Barilla ,etc: "poca relación entre consumo de azúcar y la diabetes tipo II"💲➕👩🔬=💩 http…
RT @juanjo235929: Segun Coca-cola, kellogg's, Pasta Barilla ,etc: "poca relación entre consumo de azúcar y la diabetes tipo II"💲➕👩🔬=💩 http…
Segun Coca-cola, kellogg's, Pasta Barilla ,etc: "poca relación entre consumo de azúcar y la diabetes tipo II"💲➕👩🔬=💩 https://t.co/xCmrxNHhIy https://t.co/BAPEvUNeem
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
"Current evidence does not allow us to conclude fructose-containing sugars independent of food form are associated w increased risk of T2D" https://t.co/erlBRvCscE
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
RT @SamueleMarcora: Clearly there is no strong positive association between sugar and type 2 diabetes. Other factors more important https:/…
Clearly there is no strong positive association between sugar and type 2 diabetes. Other factors more important https://t.co/1zozl7tYhv
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
Does sugar cause diabetes? Another theory unsupported by the evidence. https://t.co/CaUKYHkFNC
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
#sugar sweetened beverages associated with reduction in T2 #diabetes. This should be the death blow to the #sodatax #con. https://t.co/ieYbD3VhWp
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
RT @whsource: Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke
Meta-analysis: "Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes" https://t.co/H3ENEmzgke