RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: @ellyhowse Disagree I’m afraid I’ve no idea where authors get their definition of EBM from It just parrots refuted criticis…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: @ellyhowse Disagree I’m afraid I’ve no idea where authors get their definition of EBM from It just parrots refuted criticis…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
RT @dnunan79: I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT…
I’ve just re-read the paper by Sharon Straus I cited here. It is a pearl. I mean look…. Anyone still banging the “EBM = RCT”/“doesn’t consider other evidence/experience” is literally 20+ years behind. https://t.co/BgiNwsGPg2
RT @dnunan79: @ellyhowse Disagree I’m afraid I’ve no idea where authors get their definition of EBM from It just parrots refuted criticis…
RT @dnunan79: @ellyhowse Disagree I’m afraid I’ve no idea where authors get their definition of EBM from It just parrots refuted criticis…
RT @dnunan79: @ellyhowse Disagree I’m afraid I’ve no idea where authors get their definition of EBM from It just parrots refuted criticis…
RT @dnunan79: @ellyhowse Disagree I’m afraid I’ve no idea where authors get their definition of EBM from It just parrots refuted criticis…
@ellyhowse Disagree I’m afraid I’ve no idea where authors get their definition of EBM from It just parrots refuted criticisms others have been making for the past 20 year: https://t.co/n51j76c672 Brings nothing new (pics from 2022) And continues to wa
@mikejohansenmd @RWJE_BA “Let’s go round again….” https://t.co/Fr9cvDmQNQ “…one more time…” https://t.co/n51j76c672 https://t.co/cTgEGIILBX
Plus a fair few Zombie 🧟♂️ 🧟♀️ criticisms in the replies. This is a helpful slayer of such: https://t.co/Ie4saZkwiS https://t.co/VrXrzxbYfK
RT @dnunan79: Whenever I see “In EBM...”, followed by a critique of “issues/flaws”, inevitably the definition of “EBM” that follows is not…
@PasiMalmi @TeemuVKarjalain @JuhaniKnuuti Tsekkaa tää paperi kanssa. Kun näytät kuvassa käsittelevän ja twiiteissä hoitosuosituksia, niidenkin puutteita on jonkun verran tutkittu. Esim. Taloudelliset intressit, kriitikittömyys vallitsevia tapoja kohtaan jn
RT @dnunan79: Whenever I see “In EBM...”, followed by a critique of “issues/flaws”, inevitably the definition of “EBM” that follows is not…
RT @netshrink: This is good paper everyone concerned about the healthcare they receive, should read That means YOU! #EvidenceBasedMedicin…
RT @netshrink: This is good paper everyone concerned about the healthcare they receive, should read That means YOU! #EvidenceBasedMedicine
Evidence Based Medicine not without problems... #EBM https://t.co/VGxPq3yKjU
RT @netshrink: This is good paper everyone concerned about the healthcare they receive, should read That means YOU! #EvidenceBasedMedicine
RT @BernieGarrett: This is so true for the wider discussions of EBP. The straw man fallacy is alive and well
This is so true for the wider discussions of EBP. The straw man fallacy is alive and well
This is good paper everyone concerned about the healthcare they receive, should read That means YOU! #EvidenceBasedMedicine
RT @dnunan79: Whenever I see “In EBM...”, followed by a critique of “issues/flaws”, inevitably the definition of “EBM” that follows is not…
Efforts in EBM need to be directed toward improving clinicians‚ access to evid at point of care; developing better methods of describing evid 2 pts in order 2 facilitate shared decision-making & conducting studies 2 test whether and how EBM affects pro
Whenever I see “In EBM...”, followed by a critique of “issues/flaws”, inevitably the definition of “EBM” that follows is not one I recognise. Also, they rarely present something that hasn’t already been corrected/addressed in this: https://t.co/dL4p3OlQCa
@JeremySussman @VPrasadMDMPH @anish_koka Thanks. Some examples included here: https://t.co/n51j76c672
RT @dnunan79: More accurate title suggestions: 1. "Some common critiques (or challenges) of the generators & users of health research & ev…
RT @dnunan79: More accurate title suggestions: 1. "Some common critiques (or challenges) of the generators & users of health research & ev…
More accurate title suggestions: 1. "Some common critiques (or challenges) of the generators & users of health research & evidence ('evidence ecosystem') that many folks have considered/trying to tackle" https://t.co/dL4p3OlQCa https://t.co/FCmaO
RT @dnunan79: What I love about “EBMers” (ie - people who want to best answer the patient/public question at the start of this thread), is…
What I love about “EBMers” (ie - people who want to best answer the patient/public question at the start of this thread), is they are their own worst critic. Some even systematically reviewed criticisms/misconceptions of EBM. On RCT misconception: https:/
Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms https://t.co/qj6dYO4hp2 https://t.co/o1OaNDD0TS
RT @joaqmorera: La mayoría de mis pacientes y sus características no se incluyen en los estudios que dan lugar a la base de la evidencia. L…
RT @KGHNHSLibrary: RT @CochraneUK: A systematic review of common criticisms of evidence-based medicine: https://t.co/wcFd4xV2K3 @dnunan79 o…
RT @CochraneUK: A systematic review of common criticisms of evidence-based medicine: https://t.co/wcFd4xV2K3 @dnunan79 of @CebmOxford #EvidenceLive https://t.co/HvTZXwOGUc
RT @trishgreenhalgh: This does rather illustrate (unwittingly) the limitations of systematic review as a vehicle for critique. (ducks) ht…
Nice summary #impsci https://t.co/aM61gYV525
RT @trishgreenhalgh: This does rather illustrate (unwittingly) the limitations of systematic review as a vehicle for critique. (ducks) ht…
RT @nxtstop1: Thread: DAY 1 #EvidenceLive via @CebmOxford @EvidenceLive MT @CochraneUK A systematic review of common criticisms of evidence…
RT @nxtstop1: Thread: DAY 1 #EvidenceLive via @CebmOxford @EvidenceLive MT @CochraneUK A systematic review of common criticisms of evidence…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: This does rather illustrate (unwittingly) the limitations of systematic review as a vehicle for critique. (ducks) ht…
Thread: DAY 1 #EvidenceLive via @CebmOxford @EvidenceLive MT @CochraneUK A systematic review of common criticisms of evidence-based medicine –– by Sharon E. Straus and Finlay A. McAlister Open Access >> https://t.co/IBBAt4ppum via @dnunan79 of @CebmO
RT @joaqmorera: La mayoría de mis pacientes y sus características no se incluyen en los estudios que dan lugar a la base de la evidencia. L…
Where is the evidence for evidence based medicine? More research needed? https://t.co/F9guKCxdlf
Excellent resource for @UniDerbyNursing March 17 students who need to write critically about EBP https://t.co/EcWj3jFA2q
Those who promote the term “evidence-informed practice” take note... https://t.co/q5at9vz4mC
Yes, but how does ebm with its numbers needed to treat non individualist approach sync with personalised medicine where very careful stratification and tailoring to individual biology guides intervention. IMHO The challenge for our times https://t.co/Zhd9M
RT @trishgreenhalgh: This does rather illustrate (unwittingly) the limitations of systematic review as a vehicle for critique. (ducks) ht…
RT @CochraneUK: A systematic review of common criticisms of evidence-based medicine: https://t.co/SO517bce5o @dnunan79 of @CebmOxford #Evid…
RT @CochraneUK: A systematic review of common criticisms of evidence-based medicine: https://t.co/SO517bce5o @dnunan79 of @CebmOxford #Evid…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: This does rather illustrate (unwittingly) the limitations of systematic review as a vehicle for critique. (ducks) ht…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: This does rather illustrate (unwittingly) the limitations of systematic review as a vehicle for critique. (ducks) ht…
This does rather illustrate (unwittingly) the limitations of systematic review as a vehicle for critique. (ducks) https://t.co/wGpH84KUL8
EBM wordt nogal eens niet goed begrepen........#EBM https://t.co/h6wsp80TqX
RT @joaqmorera: La mayoría de mis pacientes y sus características no se incluyen en los estudios que dan lugar a la base de la evidencia. L…
La mayoría de mis pacientes y sus características no se incluyen en los estudios que dan lugar a la base de la evidencia. La aplicación de la evidencia a cada caso concreto resulta realmente impredecible https://t.co/4SDNPZCWUP
@soler_kike Bueno segun se mire y la información que uno tuviera hace 20 años http://t.co/3VbdSIBtXR http://t.co/E47u7MImgd
@ktibus @22venkateshN @Tetenterre @E10_9 Take your own advice lately? http://t.co/hrh7fm4erc Enough of the pseudo-skeptic spin already.