↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Frequent blood donors risk iron deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Frequent blood donors risk iron deficiency
Published in
CMAJ, June 2014
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.109-4807
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Shuchman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 50%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,235,907
of 13,652,101 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#3,849
of 6,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,258
of 193,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#69
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,652,101 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.