@lacavernemythe 1/2👍Notamment le § : "Evènements ultérieurs". Alors pour compléter/Pourquoi a-t-il disparu ?: https://t.co/ZfoJ0Nu4Kn https://t.co/MvrFs29iiV Et/recherches de GOF (à risque ...potentiel ?): https://t.co/cZ3OTBvv5o https://t.co/OZMCA54hlb Po
@KarlPettersso10 @rockytfs @BallouxFrancois @AgnesWold 🧐: 1/ Le SRAS(Cov1) sans réservoir est issu d'une évolution non naturelle, a connu l' évolution inverse , et a finalement disparu dans le monde: https://t.co/ZfoJ0Nu4Kn 2/Why SARS will not return: a po
RT @BeaucampI: @JCPEREZCODEX @olivierveran @andrebercoff @xazalbert Pourquoi le SRASCov(1) ne reviendra pas, ...sauf si ? https://t.co/MvrF…
RT @BeaucampI: @JCPEREZCODEX @olivierveran @andrebercoff @xazalbert Pourquoi le SRASCov(1) ne reviendra pas, ...sauf si ? https://t.co/MvrF…
@JCPEREZCODEX @olivierveran @andrebercoff @xazalbert Pourquoi le SRASCov(1) ne reviendra pas, ...sauf si ? https://t.co/MvrFs29Q8t
@SAutodidacte @kerviel_j Why SRAS Cov (1) will not return ? Votre avis sur cette polémique ? Le mien : parce qu'll n'y a pas eu de vaxination en population générale. Ce qui lui a donné le temps de "régresser "? https://t.co/MvrFs1RGUl
RT @janey15408827: Ha;ha https://t.co/LYtFvA4u21
Ha;ha https://t.co/LYtFvA4u21
"You need to look back to 2004 to get the same number [increase in stillbirth rate] as in 2021." What happened in 2004 that could have contributed to stillbirth rate increase? 2002–2004 SARS outbreak, 16 November 2002 – 19 May 2004 https://t.co/9Yb3hnnK0R
@pekweet @AnnaKorhonen3 @Tuulikk15413128 @liisailonahein1 Kannattaa tutustua ensin ihan perusasioihin ennenkuin alkaa huutelemaan. https://t.co/9P7HxwLtWd
Hmmm... on elimination of COVID-19... US NIH (2004) on SARS: https://t.co/Nbc4tm100d WHO on MERS (up to 2019): https://t.co/Nod2NnYN0W And a BMJ article about an elimination strategy for COVID-19: https://t.co/whu4aL3GOc #BorisBullshitBriefing #TheJohn
@CMA_Docs 2004 So much for Dr.Low's theory 😏 https://t.co/f7vL0XQB73
@CMA_Docs 2004 So much for Dr.Low's theory 😏 https://t.co/f7vL0Xz0fv
@PoorlyAgedStuff
Interesting. Came across this. https://t.co/IjTQGm38mN
RT @ABsteward: Article 2004 @CMAJ Why SARS will not return: a polemic The return #SARSCoV2 after 15 years. RIP Dr. Donald Low @maureentaylo…
@deanprocter @bennyjohnson @jeeezelouise @WHO @DrTedros It was the SARS-CoV, lab accident, read here. https://t.co/afBlt47PUS
RT @SpockResists: So the question could be. Did Covid-19 come from a human reservoir that was carrying the original SARS virus in a mutat…
RT @SpockResists: So the question could be. Did Covid-19 come from a human reservoir that was carrying the original SARS virus in a mutat…
So the question could be. Did Covid-19 come from a human reservoir that was carrying the original SARS virus in a mutated form? You have to ask the questions. Read this. Why SARS will not return: a polemic https://t.co/IT1Vu2dWwE
@JZAK07 @KaiserWunderbar @emceebeenj @LegendaryEnergy This is an interesting article from years ago but apparently China didn’t learn its lesson as stated here . https://t.co/02KchcKVP1
@josephfcox The 2003 spillover from a lab in Singapore, geniuses. https://t.co/afBlt47PUS
@AmarilleIan CMAJ. 2004 Jan 6; 170(1): 68–69. https://t.co/afBlt47PUS https://t.co/N7NtmDo2TA
RT @A__Aicha: 2. La ré-activation. Le virus disparait puis.. se réactive. En gros, le virus aurait une phase de latence. Les coronavirus ne…
RT @A__Aicha: 2. La ré-activation. Le virus disparait puis.. se réactive. En gros, le virus aurait une phase de latence. Les coronavirus ne…
RT @A__Aicha: 2. La ré-activation. Le virus disparait puis.. se réactive. En gros, le virus aurait une phase de latence. Les coronavirus ne…
2. La ré-activation. Le virus disparait puis.. se réactive. En gros, le virus aurait une phase de latence. Les coronavirus ne sont pas connus pour avoir une phase de latence MAIS le SARS-CoV-2 est nouveau! https://t.co/UAR4SCLqQ3 https://t.co/2Ex7ZCdlvb
RT @ABsteward: Article 2004 @CMAJ Why SARS will not return: a polemic The return #SARSCoV2 after 15 years. RIP Dr. Donald Low @maureentaylo…
RT @ABsteward: Article 2004 @CMAJ Why SARS will not return: a polemic The return #SARSCoV2 after 15 years. RIP Dr. Donald Low @maureentaylo…
Article 2004 @CMAJ Why SARS will not return: a polemic The return #SARSCoV2 after 15 years. RIP Dr. Donald Low @maureentaylor31 @DFisman #COVID19 https://t.co/cXwA7OTBcW https://t.co/ujuLQuZ86F
RT @alt_kia: this, too, aged well: https://t.co/EtPZUVjEHT
RT @alt_kia: this, too, aged well: https://t.co/EtPZUVjEHT
RT @alt_kia: this, too, aged well: https://t.co/EtPZUVjEHT
“Most experts agree that China has learned its lesson from the first outbreak, when authorities did not respond in a rapid and appropriate manner, allowing the virus to circumnavigate the globe.”
RT @alt_kia: this, too, aged well: https://t.co/EtPZUVjEHT
this, too, aged well: https://t.co/EtPZUVjEHT
@HelenBranswell Loved this https://t.co/deW3u9Gj1g
@DMBr0wnie @MrTea25594152 @KellyCates This article regarding the previous SARS outbreak may be useful here. Zoonotic viruses (like CV19) tend to lack the right reservoirs to attack again. This is a feature of viruses that arrive from animal sources. https
@HelenBranswell @HotaSusy Déja vu, but it's not SARS. https://t.co/VUO6ivPXIq
@twpiggott Pretty cool. Trying to get my head around doing anal swabs on bats. And I was reminded of this chestnut: https://t.co/cgHI0QYNlK @HelenBranswell
@aetiology @brookeborel Correct. But I think it's unlikely to cause another human outbreak http://t.co/vd8PRg8q2f