↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

How the 1950s changed our understanding of traumatic encephalopathy and its sequelae

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
102 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
How the 1950s changed our understanding of traumatic encephalopathy and its sequelae
Published in
CMAJ, February 2018
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.171204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen T. Casper

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 36%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 18%
Psychology 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#239,502
of 14,463,628 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#513
of 6,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,150
of 359,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#19
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,463,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.