↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

“Is there a doctor on board?”: Practical recommendations for managing in-flight medical emergencies

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 5,424)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
275 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
“Is there a doctor on board?”: Practical recommendations for managing in-flight medical emergencies
Published in
CMAJ, February 2018
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.170601
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Kodama, Bobby Yanagawa, Jim Chung, Ken Fryatt, Alun D. Ackery

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 275 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 24%
Professor 4 19%
Lecturer 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 71%
Unspecified 6 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 477. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,941
of 11,766,839 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#27
of 5,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#964
of 269,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#4
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,766,839 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.