| Title |
Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.170958 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Bruneau, Keith Ahamad, Marie-Ève Goyer, Ginette Poulin, Peter Selby, Benedikt Fischer, T Cameron Wild, Evan Wood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 468 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 162 | 35% |
| United States | 113 | 24% |
| Spain | 13 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Djibouti | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 4% |
| Unknown | 143 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 310 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 78 | 17% |
| Scientists | 66 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 371 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 15% |
| Other | 33 | 9% |
| Researcher | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 18% |
| Unknown | 113 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 10% |
| Psychology | 22 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 13% |
| Unknown | 135 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 635. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#35,241
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#60
of 9,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#802
of 348,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.