@prudhoju Excellent et ça c’est après des siècles de biais homme femme bien mesurable au Canada https://t.co/knJHHnHiIH
@AdjutorV Voici. Ça aurait dû s'y trouver, c'est vrai. https://t.co/eOyyKYoQPt
@TallAllen @enenbee @KeithKow @LauraBukavinaMD @EUplatinum Here is an example of bias in STEM. This doesn't disappear when looked at closely. Many more like this from different countries. https://t.co/t8gVo4OESK
@TallAllen @KeithKow @enenbee @LauraBukavinaMD @EUplatinum Women are funded less and so become less competitive over time. Again bias shown in the system that puts women off staying in it. There are many others like this. https://t.co/t8gVo4OESK
RT @Farah__Ahmad: Does CIHR already know who should be funded? What was purpose of updating “requirement” for appl eligigiblity 3 days befo…
Does CIHR already know who should be funded? What was purpose of updating “requirement” for appl eligigiblity 3 days before deadline that ALL FIVE obj should be met? Good it was retrieved next day. Honestly, losing trust; there is/was gender base👇 https://
@sacquin_mo Je crois me souvenir de quelques études sur les biais dans l'attribution de grants de recherche (ex. https://t.co/75m8VoXd33, mais il doit y en avoir plus).
@HodaMagid @RobynTamblyn They found that grants reviewed by 2 women had the lowest scores overall, but I don't think (?) they looked at interaction by applicant & reviewer sex. See Table 4: https://t.co/HtmvjJ8yZL
Link to article: https://t.co/csh0q8PNUz
Here are three recent papers on the subject across two countries: https://t.co/nWv3h6dwBx https://t.co/JGUHN8XMyP https://t.co/0ud6k648ia
RT @shoffmania: 7) The science of science funding is in desperate need of more science! @CIHR_IRSC has been contributing to some of this (e…
7) The science of science funding is in desperate need of more science! @CIHR_IRSC has been contributing to some of this (e.g., peer review https://t.co/fyoxAJhFec; gender biases https://t.co/C3xBjWEfxv) but as funders, we need to do more and encourage oth
RT @KhouryMD: Good reason why gender masking in grant applications important. #WomenInMedicine https://t.co/tsJt3sAORh
Good reason why gender masking in grant applications important. #WomenInMedicine https://t.co/tsJt3sAORh
RT @hwitteman: @jwoodgett @DebSiegal @DrCChambers @CIHR_IRSC The data suggest that women are tougher CIHR reviewers. (I suspect this is con…
RT @hwitteman: @jwoodgett @DebSiegal @DrCChambers @CIHR_IRSC The data suggest that women are tougher CIHR reviewers. (I suspect this is con…
@jwoodgett @DebSiegal @DrCChambers @CIHR_IRSC The data suggest that women are tougher CIHR reviewers. (I suspect this is confounded by pillar—lots more women in pillars 2, 3 & 4. Scores are typically lower in pillars 3 & 4. Lots of picky methodolo
Currently I can expect peer reviewers to be biased against my female sounding name: https://t.co/55a6b2WpBq
@LiisaGalea @kamerlinlab @AgnesWold No NSERC analysis that I know of but this has been analyzed to some extent at CIHR: https://t.co/oXTv6GfmnM https://t.co/zEUTn0Kj5Z
RT @hwitteman: @AngryMidAgedPI @michaelhoffman @JennyRohn @drugmonkeyblog @CIHR_IRSC Here’s the analysis on scores (review focus is mostly…
RT @hwitteman: @AngryMidAgedPI @michaelhoffman @JennyRohn @drugmonkeyblog @CIHR_IRSC Here’s the analysis on scores (review focus is mostly…
@AngryMidAgedPI @michaelhoffman @JennyRohn @drugmonkeyblog @CIHR_IRSC Here’s the analysis on scores (review focus is mostly science here, but assessment of PI, team, environment, expertise still plays a role.) tl;dr they adjusted for publication record, fu
@anecdatally @EpiEllie I was thinking of double blind review when I referenced AJE, which I agree is a very important thing. I used to prefer unblinded review until I saw papers like this: https://t.co/5iugZc22jq Then I decided it was very important to
RT @sarahkmels: @picardonhealth @CIHR_IRSC @DeanBeeby @CBCNews In-person meetings *could* help to mitigate bias in grant reviews - which as…
RT @BoggildLab: Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada | CMAJ https://t.co/jbXkwLeLij
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada | CMAJ https://t.co/jbXkwLeLij
@picardonhealth @CIHR_IRSC @DeanBeeby @CBCNews In-person meetings *could* help to mitigate bias in grant reviews - which as per recent @CMAJ article seems to be quite an issue: https://t.co/b6ERLNbBAj
Bias in CIHR peer review "of sufficient magnitude to change application scores from fundable to nonfundable": https://t.co/ynM1aYqvOh
RT @sodesroches: Potential gender bias in research grant peer review in Canada may influence which projects are funded https://t.co/JloYzn…
@Protohedgehog Some work links, I found (started collecting them for a future post quite recently, so it's just two yet, now three thanks to your tip) https://t.co/OlaxEpqyxm https://t.co/kMPRcy9O2g
Potential solutions: https://t.co/lwCWS0kGHY 1) streamlined recruitment, hiring, & promotions processes, 2) unconscious bias training for leaders, 3) hold meetings during work hours, 4) formalized mentorship, 5) consistent monitoring https://t.co/JMqIC
RT @StirlingBryan: Thanks for sharing this piece, @PaulaLorgelly More food for thought, on the insidious nature of gender bias in health r…
Thanks for sharing this piece, @PaulaLorgelly More food for thought, on the insidious nature of gender bias in health research, at https://t.co/1bqs9Iiu8G - thanks @RobynTamblyn for this great work! https://t.co/DoLI4IYVEm
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada @CMAJ https://t.co/KyXMqYZyAP
Wonder when this will change? https://t.co/QjHxzqxQCK
RT @mariacsegovia: Estudio en Canadá 🇨🇦 encuentra potencial sesgo de género en revisores de fondos de investigación @CientificasEC https:/…
Interesante. Falta Mismo estudio en chile. A simple vista, la tasa de acierto de Fondecyt por U tiene alta variabilidad. ¿Causa? https://t.co/ZW0fU9bthn
RT @mariacsegovia: Estudio en Canadá 🇨🇦 encuentra potencial sesgo de género en revisores de fondos de investigación @CientificasEC https:/…
RT @mariacsegovia: Estudio en Canadá 🇨🇦 encuentra potencial sesgo de género en revisores de fondos de investigación @CientificasEC https:/…
RT @mariacsegovia: Estudio en Canadá 🇨🇦 encuentra potencial sesgo de género en revisores de fondos de investigación @CientificasEC https:/…
RT @mariacsegovia: Estudio en Canadá 🇨🇦 encuentra potencial sesgo de género en revisores de fondos de investigación @CientificasEC https:/…
RT @mariacsegovia: Estudio en Canadá 🇨🇦 encuentra potencial sesgo de género en revisores de fondos de investigación @CientificasEC https:/…
Estudio en Canadá 🇨🇦 encuentra potencial sesgo de género en revisores de fondos de investigación @CientificasEC https://t.co/NvSDQcSH4B
Not ok https://t.co/HLGWwPyebI
Potential #GenderBias against #FemaleResearchers in #PeerReview of #ResearchGrants https://t.co/EL6eLJeuGQ
In news that will surprise few women in science, results from a Canadian study suggest that the grant peer-review process is biased against women. https://t.co/7p1dnelVTv
RT @fgrazz: Hmmm, "There is evidence of bias in peer review of operating grants that is of sufficient magnitude to change application score…
RT @CMAJ: New study uncovers potential gender bias in #cdnhealth #research grant #peerreview https://t.co/L69jjoEK9D @CIHR_IRSC @RobynTamb…
Gender bias in peer review process https://t.co/ZwkcF5BcMX
RT @Research_Voice: Assessment of potential bias in #research grant #peerreview in #Canada: reviewers with more expertise more likely to pr…
RT @Research_Voice: Assessment of potential bias in #research grant #peerreview in #Canada: reviewers with more expertise more likely to pr…
Her er den kanadiske studien artikkelen bygger på: https://t.co/OWxyNR4UN2
The original Canadian study can be found here: https://t.co/OWxyNR4UN2
RT @Research_Voice: Assessment of potential bias in #research grant #peerreview in #Canada: reviewers with more expertise more likely to pr…
Assessment of potential bias in #research grant #peerreview in #Canada: reviewers with more expertise more likely to provide higher scores to applicants with higher past success rates https://t.co/7MslaIjmwG @IRSC_CIHR @CIHR_IRSC
RT @CAlvarezdardet: https://t.co/BZmgumFqiU Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada https://t.co/BZmgumFqiU
RT @hwitteman: Gender bias apparent in health research peer review (CIHR OOGP 2012-2014, previous Canadian open grants program) after acco…
Well this is a little disheartening for the woman applied scientists out there https://t.co/W5lOL3xO4b
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada https://t.co/SwlFTAcIYb
RT @MHendr1cks: And the outcomes of this biased process were used to determine who was Excellent enough to get a CIHR Foundation Grant (and…
RT @RobynTamblyn: Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada https://t.co/RjG0iKjFAP @CMAJ
RT @hwitteman: Gender bias apparent in health research peer review (CIHR OOGP 2012-2014, previous Canadian open grants program) after acco…
RT @MerrynGott: ‘Female applicants were more likely to apply with multiple co-investigators, ask for less funding, have their application t…
RT @MerrynGott: ‘Female applicants were more likely to apply with multiple co-investigators, ask for less funding, have their application t…
‘Female applicants were more likely to apply with multiple co-investigators, ask for less funding, have their application triaged, be reviewed by female reviewers’....interesting @katmcphe https://t.co/HIB688aaAd
RT @gailtomblin: We have a long way to go. Thanks to @RobynTamblyn @CIHR_IRSC for bringing this it light. @DalVPR @DalHealth @DalNursing @n…
RT @thanec: Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada @CMAJ https://t.co/5YA34yzUkZ
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada @CMAJ https://t.co/5YA34yzUkZ
RT @gailtomblin: We have a long way to go. Thanks to @RobynTamblyn @CIHR_IRSC for bringing this it light. @DalVPR @DalHealth @DalNursing @n…
RT @gailtomblin: We have a long way to go. Thanks to @RobynTamblyn @CIHR_IRSC for bringing this it light. @DalVPR @DalHealth @DalNursing @n…
RT @VPDeanEidelman: It’s not easy being a woman. At least when you submit a grant! Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer revi…
RT @chelseavmoran: A study on peer review biases in the evaluation of CIHR operating grants. Study authors also found that when controlling…
RT @chelseavmoran: A study on peer review biases in the evaluation of CIHR operating grants. Study authors also found that when controlling…
RT @chelseavmoran: A study on peer review biases in the evaluation of CIHR operating grants. Study authors also found that when controlling…
RT @chelseavmoran: A study on peer review biases in the evaluation of CIHR operating grants. Study authors also found that when controlling…
Great remark! Actually this was the topic of the CCHCSP monthly meeting at CHU- St. @ChuSteJustine https://t.co/sIUeH8zKHU
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada https://t.co/6pvrEVF5nz
RT @chelseavmoran: A study on peer review biases in the evaluation of CIHR operating grants. Study authors also found that when controlling…
A study on peer review biases in the evaluation of CIHR operating grants. Study authors also found that when controlling for scientific productivity, female applicants with equal past success rates as male applicants received lower scores. https://t.co/Wc4
RT @MalindaSmith: 42)”Peer review is used to determine what research is funded and published,yet little is known about its effectiveness, a…
RT @hwitteman: Current status: resisting the temptation to go post this on every discussion I had in the past 2 years in which people asser…
RT @RobynTamblyn: Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada https://t.co/RjG0iKjFAP @CMAJ
RT @CMAJ: New study uncovers potential gender bias in #cdnhealth #research grant #peerreview https://t.co/L69jjoEK9D @CIHR_IRSC @RobynTamb…
RT @jocalynclark: Gender bias in peer review at @CIHR_IRSC. New study + commentary @CMAJ https://t.co/b9b52IBHD0 #genderequity #WomenInSc…
RT @CMAJ: New study uncovers potential gender bias in #cdnhealth #research grant #peerreview https://t.co/L69jjoEK9D @CIHR_IRSC @RobynTamb…
RT @CMAJ: New study uncovers potential gender bias in #cdnhealth #research grant #peerreview https://t.co/L69jjoEK9D @CIHR_IRSC @RobynTamb…
New paper via @CMAJ identifies #genderbias in #peerreview of research grants that may penalize women h/t @ghn_news https://t.co/yAMD8ltgn0
RT @gailtomblin: We have a long way to go. Thanks to @RobynTamblyn @CIHR_IRSC for bringing this it light. @DalVPR @DalHealth @DalNursing @n…
And here is the original study: https://t.co/AC9cEmlG7e https://t.co/7zEbKzmDCl
RT @fgrazz: Hmmm, "There is evidence of bias in peer review of operating grants that is of sufficient magnitude to change application score…
Hmmm, "There is evidence of bias in peer review of operating grants that is of sufficient magnitude to change application scores from fundable to nonfundable" https://t.co/4M4lMKuHs3
RT @RobynTamblyn: Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada https://t.co/RjG0iKjFAP @CMAJ
RT @gailtomblin: We have a long way to go. Thanks to @RobynTamblyn @CIHR_IRSC for bringing this it light. @DalVPR @DalHealth @DalNursing @n…
RT @salthorne: Evidence of gender bias in peer review of CIHR operating grants that is of sufficient magnitude to change application scores…
RT @salthorne: Evidence of gender bias in peer review of CIHR operating grants that is of sufficient magnitude to change application scores…
RT @hwitteman: Gender bias apparent in health research peer review (CIHR OOGP 2012-2014, previous Canadian open grants program) after acco…