↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Reducing pain during vaccine injections: clinical practice guideline

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 6,858)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Reducing pain during vaccine injections: clinical practice guideline
Published in
CMAJ, August 2015
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.150391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Taddio, C. Meghan McMurtry, Vibhuti Shah, Rebecca Pillai Riddell, Christine T. Chambers, Melanie Noel, Noni E. MacDonald, Jess Rogers, Lucie M. Bucci, Patricia Mousmanis, Eddy Lang, Scott A. Halperin, Susan Bowles, Christine Halpert, Moshe Ipp, Gordon J.G. Asmundson, Michael J. Rieder, Kate Robson, Elizabeth Uleryk, Martin M. Antony, Vinita Dubey, Anita Hanrahan, Donna Lockett, Jeffrey Scott, Elizabeth Votta Bleeker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Other 18 12%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 25%
Psychology 19 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 30 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 481. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#22,763
of 15,281,155 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#39
of 6,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#403
of 240,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#1
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,281,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.