RT @methodsnerd: Understanding results (effect size, 95%CI, certainty of evidence) & applicability of results are core skills of "health pr…
RT @methodsnerd: Understanding results (effect size, 95%CI, certainty of evidence) & applicability of results are core skills of "health pr…
Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries by @methodsnerd et al https://t.co/6Qr327qlIg https://t.co/6F4eD8f2j6
Understanding results (effect size, 95%CI, certainty of evidence) & applicability of results are core skills of "health professionals" curriculum. Major CMAJ paper to support this position 👇 https://t.co/5kvsjDwEEh NB: To some critical appr involves Ro
RT @BU_BMC_Rheum: Nice discussion at our #methodology #JournalClub on clinicians' understanding of the magnitude of treatment effects Thi…
Nice discussion at our #methodology #JournalClub on clinicians' understanding of the magnitude of treatment effects This focuses on different ways to present continuous outcomes & treatment effects, and whether clinicians surveyed understood them or
#methodology #JournalClub, TODAY, starting soon at 12:15pm ET, still time to register! 👉https://t.co/9M48DdCDRG 📰"Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects?" 🐈⬛Discussion led by @rheum_cat 🔗https://t.co/IbRbovHjnL
RT @BU_BMC_Rheum: Have you registered for our next #methodology #JournalClub? 👉https://t.co/9M48DdDbHe 📅Wednesday, June 21, 12:15PM ET 📰"…
Have you registered for our next #methodology #JournalClub? 👉https://t.co/9M48DdDbHe 📅Wednesday, June 21, 12:15PM ET 📰"Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects?" 🐈⬛Discussion led by @rheum_cat 🔗https://t.co/IbRbovHRdj
Let’s have a discussion!
Have you registered for our next #methodology #JournalClub? 👉https://t.co/9M48DdCDRG 📅Wednesday, June 21, 12:15PM ET 📰"Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects?" 🐈⬛Discussion led by @rheum_cat 🔗https://t.co/IbRbovHjnL
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @BU_BMC_Rheum: Have you registered for our next #methodology #JournalClub? 👉https://t.co/9M48DdCDRG 📅Wednesday, June 21, 12:15PM ET 📰"…
Have you registered for our next #methodology #JournalClub? 👉https://t.co/9M48DdCDRG 📅Wednesday, June 21, 12:15PM ET 📰"Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects?" 🐈⬛Discussion led by @rheum_cat 🔗https://t.co/IbRbovHjnL
RT @igoreckert: @noah_greifer Clinicians do not know what marginal and conditional effects are. Most don't even comprehend the very basics…
RT @igoreckert: @noah_greifer Clinicians do not know what marginal and conditional effects are. Most don't even comprehend the very basics…
🤡🤡
RT @igoreckert: @noah_greifer Clinicians do not know what marginal and conditional effects are. Most don't even comprehend the very basics…
RT @igoreckert: @noah_greifer Clinicians do not know what marginal and conditional effects are. Most don't even comprehend the very basics…
@noah_greifer Clinicians do not know what marginal and conditional effects are. Most don't even comprehend the very basics of biostatistics. There's some interesting descriptive research on this, e.g.: https://t.co/wH4WtpcNny
RT @KariTikkinen: @lassitlaitala @Medisiinarit @NuoriLaakari Tutkimme efektikokojen ymmärrystä muutamassa maassa 🇨🇦 🇨🇱 🇫🇮 🇱🇧 🇳🇴 🇪🇸🇨🇭🇺🇸 @C…
RT @KariTikkinen: @lassitlaitala @Medisiinarit @NuoriLaakari Tutkimme efektikokojen ymmärrystä muutamassa maassa 🇨🇦 🇨🇱 🇫🇮 🇱🇧 🇳🇴 🇪🇸🇨🇭🇺🇸 @C…
@lassitlaitala @Medisiinarit @NuoriLaakari Tutkimme efektikokojen ymmärrystä muutamassa maassa 🇨🇦 🇨🇱 🇫🇮 🇱🇧 🇳🇴 🇪🇸🇨🇭🇺🇸 @CMAJ-julkaisumme mukaan puutteita oli valitettavasti sekä erikoistuvilla että erikoislääkäreillä #EBM https://t.co/cL1gp8rwcd https://t.
RT @MasatsuguSakata: わかりにくい治療の効果量。 やや近似値にはなっても、できるだけ臨床家として受け入れやすいリスク差、つまり、反応率または寛解率○%vs○%、に変換して理解していこうと思います。
RT @MasatsuguSakata: わかりにくい治療の効果量。 やや近似値にはなっても、できるだけ臨床家として受け入れやすいリスク差、つまり、反応率または寛解率○%vs○%、に変換して理解していこうと思います。
RT @MasatsuguSakata: わかりにくい治療の効果量。 やや近似値にはなっても、できるだけ臨床家として受け入れやすいリスク差、つまり、反応率または寛解率○%vs○%、に変換して理解していこうと思います。
わかりにくい治療の効果量。 やや近似値にはなっても、できるだけ臨床家として受け入れやすいリスク差、つまり、反応率または寛解率○%vs○%、に変換して理解していこうと思います。
Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? https://t.co/HxMWkUZPtn
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @MasatsuguSakata: エビデンスに基づく実践の困難の一つは、研究で報告された数値の理解をすることです。 8か国の臨床家対象の調査によると、二分法的なリスク差(その介入で何%の患者が改善するか)が理解しやすく、かつ有用と認識されていました。逆に連続的な平均差は…
RT @MasatsuguSakata: エビデンスに基づく実践の困難の一つは、研究で報告された数値の理解をすることです。 8か国の臨床家対象の調査によると、二分法的なリスク差(その介入で何%の患者が改善するか)が理解しやすく、かつ有用と認識されていました。逆に連続的な平均差は…
エビデンスに基づく実践の困難の一つは、研究で報告された数値の理解をすることです。 8か国の臨床家対象の調査によると、二分法的なリスク差(その介入で何%の患者が改善するか)が理解しやすく、かつ有用と認識されていました。逆に連続的な平均差は理解しづらいようです。 https://t.co/5vF4m91BdO
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
We did kind of a follow up study on this. Showing two numbers (CER &EER) was the most comprehensible. Stay tuned — we are writing up the paper!
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
RT @GuyattGH: Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they did…
Clinicians understand #binary presentations of #continuous outcomes better than any continuous outcome options. But they didn’t understand binary well! Has changed my teaching #EBM practice: by far biggest focus now is in understanding results https://t.c
RT @EBCPMcMaster: The most important paper about teaching #EBM in the last decade represents a wake up call to EBM educators: shift the foc…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: The most important paper about teaching #EBM in the last decade represents a wake up call to EBM educators: shift the foc…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: The most important paper about teaching #EBM in the last decade represents a wake up call to EBM educators: shift the foc…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: The most important paper about teaching #EBM in the last decade represents a wake up call to EBM educators: shift the foc…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: The most important paper about teaching #EBM in the last decade represents a wake up call to EBM educators: shift the foc…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: The most important paper about teaching #EBM in the last decade represents a wake up call to EBM educators: shift the foc…
The most important paper about teaching #EBM in the last decade represents a wake up call to EBM educators: shift the focus to teaching clinicians how the evaluate the #magnitude of treatment effects. https://t.co/RDVCiZgV4U https://t.co/LMpvEXLzIZ
RT @EBCPMcMaster: We should be changing our approach to teaching #EBM to focus much more on understanding results, and in particular interp…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: We should be changing our approach to teaching #EBM to focus much more on understanding results, and in particular interp…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: We should be changing our approach to teaching #EBM to focus much more on understanding results, and in particular interp…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: We should be changing our approach to teaching #EBM to focus much more on understanding results, and in particular interp…
RT @EBCPMcMaster: We should be changing our approach to teaching #EBM to focus much more on understanding results, and in particular interp…
It takes a lot of time, effort, and sacrifice to correct the miseducation we have received from people who only pretend to care about the medical profession. https://t.co/Z5SS9I82Vd
RT @EBCPMcMaster: We should be changing our approach to teaching #EBM to focus much more on understanding results, and in particular interp…
We should be changing our approach to teaching #EBM to focus much more on understanding results, and in particular interpreting #magnitudes of benefit and harm. https://t.co/rV2nnwpzPD https://t.co/9queTlGd5e
RT @GeriMedJC: Now on #GeriMedJC. @CMAJ article Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countr…
Now on #GeriMedJC. @CMAJ article Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries. https://t.co/ROuonLmYaj. Watch live https://t.co/u8RujCxlBX
@statsepi @ThomasAgoritsas I often use Thomas’ paper when teaching (thanks, Thomas) and this one as well: https://t.co/O2qT3Oi6ba
@TheEvidenceDoc Or even effect size?! https://t.co/goYg3GTAi5
Stay tuned for another #GeriMedJC (TBA) when Dr. Alibhai discusses Appendix 2: https://t.co/oBm1ynUclf https://t.co/W3Uyccd0J6
Dr. Alibhai on #GeriMedJC. Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? https://t.co/oBm1ynUclf
Do clinicians understand the meaning, size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries #statistics https://t.co/diTu4XEJbk
RT @hildabast: Clinicians don't get continuous outcome effect sizes https://t.co/s11JL4nTGD Proves my point https://t.co/S3dvrke0ml https:/…
RT @ETS_IECS: Los médicos entienden mejor las medidas dicotómicas para tomar una decisión. https://t.co/HrjwIy3wRo https://t.co/bQQsaNspYx
RT @hildabast: Clinicians don't get continuous outcome effect sizes https://t.co/s11JL4nTGD Proves my point https://t.co/S3dvrke0ml https:/…
RT @hildabast: Clinicians don't get continuous outcome effect sizes https://t.co/s11JL4nTGD Proves my point https://t.co/S3dvrke0ml https:/…
RT @hildabast: Clinicians don't get continuous outcome effect sizes https://t.co/s11JL4nTGD Proves my point https://t.co/S3dvrke0ml https:/…
RT @ETS_IECS: Los médicos entienden mejor las medidas dicotómicas para tomar una decisión. https://t.co/HrjwIy3wRo https://t.co/bQQsaNspYx
RT @hildabast: Clinicians don't get continuous outcome effect sizes https://t.co/s11JL4nTGD Proves my point https://t.co/S3dvrke0ml https:/…
RT @ETS_IECS: Los médicos entienden mejor las medidas dicotómicas para tomar una decisión. https://t.co/HrjwIy3wRo https://t.co/bQQsaNspYx
RT @hildabast: Clinicians don't get continuous outcome effect sizes https://t.co/s11JL4nTGD Proves my point https://t.co/S3dvrke0ml https:/…
RT @ETS_IECS: Los médicos entienden mejor las medidas dicotómicas para tomar una decisión. https://t.co/HrjwIy3wRo https://t.co/bQQsaNspYx
Los médicos entienden mejor las medidas dicotómicas para tomar una decisión. https://t.co/HrjwIy3wRo https://t.co/bQQsaNspYx