@tonyannett Might want to review ethical standards https://t.co/gsYPMauQFZ.

@dbeggs13 CMA does not take complaints about doctors. CMAJ actually has an article about this. When Trump was the "victim" you and others like you did not say a thing. Now it's Trudeau, you are up in arms. Only tells me your complaint is political not ethi

@Kathy202424 Doctor's can get into trouble for it too. https://t.co/u8OS7EbUwJ

@OlgaBazova Any real doctor knows you can’t make a diagnosis over a TV screen and not without personally meeting with a patient. So either this supposed “doctor” is lying or they are violating a pretty important ethics standard in medicine. https://t.co/

@arnoldpimley @gvravel @sandiechill @AndrewJBates46 @MeidasTouch @sethmeyers @POTUS https://t.co/fqgoU5qvp7. https://t.co/bRdKLyX2Zu

@RpsAgainstTrump Look up "The Goldwater Rule" https://t.co/7XLKNs0uYV

@koslen_bambi Well, those professionals should all be fired, and my guess is that most of them aren’t even doctors, otherwise that would’ve been in your tweet. https://t.co/bVxNF5XKQ8

@koslen_bambi It is never ethical for an “expert” to weigh in with a professional opinion on someone without speaking directly to them. https://t.co/bVxNF5XKQ8

@DoctorHenryCT You may want to read up on what's ethical practice, "Doctor". I sure hope you don't do this... https://t.co/vH6rEVet4z

@laesteppa Diagnosticar cosas mentales a distancia es bien iffy https://t.co/uW0wk7wHyk

@grwaterfestiva1 @TrumpDailyPosts FAKE! "Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally examined, the American Psychiatric Association" https://t.co/1tqsLZwdGk

@Leslieoo7 @glennkirschner2 @CyndyjStevens "Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally examined, the American Psychiatric Association reiterated in a statement." Looks like you have

@JoveMarie2 @Ema64938090 @Audzilla27 @browt1971 @sjpatters Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally examined, the American Psychiatric Association reiterated in a statement. https:/

@RonnyJacksonTX I know you're not smart enough to really be a practicing doctor anymore, and I recognize this article is predominantly about psychiatrists, but perhaps you should read: https://t.co/T5vLdgX1z1

@OK_Dumbass @MalcolmNance hey remember https://t.co/HCl8cfre1X

@tonyannett Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally examined, the APA reiterated in a statement. The association was reminding members about what is known as “The Goldwater Rule”

@RWMaloneMD Is that your professional medical opinion that Biden is not mentally competent to govern? https://t.co/7WO81aYDIr.

@factsvs_fiction @NashIsHereForIt https://t.co/KF0hu70V49. But I mean you do research don’t ya. Lil JD. Facts vs fiction. Clown

They only did that for political reasons They only did that for political reasons https://t.co/g60kwlLzqV

@PitDean5 @atensnut They only did that for political reasons https://t.co/g60kwlM7gt

@tribelaw Diagnosing a patient you have never personally, treated. Is unethical. Period. https://t.co/GcBWZKE5xI

@Ruby74698396 @tribelaw @Michell49685689 https://t.co/Z7nf2TXGxl.

@xpukex https://t.co/pfHDsElRJP

@RonColeman Guess Goldwater Rule be damed https://t.co/IpOwpXe7wJ

@kevinnbass Does this fit into GoldWater Rule? https://t.co/IpOwpXe7wJ

Nice try dipstick... https://t.co/Mj16mvUsSS

@MotherJones Which is worse, an activist journalist or an activist Psychiatrist. Both are committing malpractice in their field. https://t.co/IgDasfStMJ

@DocAhmadMalik Assuming you’re an actual doctor, surely you’re aware of the Goldwater Rule. https://t.co/Si9JxWjNII

@ofacursedman @bettyspolitics https://t.co/N8SgEWoc8f

@LadyMariaXs @heyjk0109 @alexhmuro https://t.co/mUWVQ6MsLN mi caridad del domingo para que las señoras “psicólogas clínicas” de twitter se eduquen un tantito😋

@Canellelabelle I know you need their opinions to be true but that doesn't make them so and I didn't lie here us what the profession says about ethics https://t.co/cqObUWToyt

@maggiemaggie23 @EbonyJHilton_MD @GadSaad https://t.co/tIs9MqgZK7

@AloeVapor @elonmusk It’s called armchair diagnostic it’s illegal https://t.co/tIs9MqgZK7 https://t.co/Eqv6L8D2hW

@TheWantonWench Shame on you! “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally examined, the American Psychiatric Association reiterated in a statement.” https://t.co/l2RiVarlq3

@Peanut05081401 @sammymarklereal @netflix https://t.co/gFTZPZA1Ml

@wuikle @YouTube https://t.co/gFTZPZA1Ml

@Backstorymom1 https://t.co/gFTZPZA1Ml

@lkamber978 Wow. Hope Dr Lieberman’s licensing board is aware of these statements she is making about a person she has never treated. https://t.co/gFTZPZA1Ml

@SuDharmapala https://t.co/gFTZPZA1Ml

@BaronessBruck Holly schiff is a psychologist, not a psychiatrist, but she should be cautioned and perhaps reprimanded by her licensing agency. https://t.co/gFTZPZA1Ml

@centerviewnews Holly Schiff is a psychologist, not a psychiatrist but the same cautions should apply. Frankly unprofessional and media-seeking. https://t.co/gFTZPZA1Ml

@Akhunzadi No you are a liar. Psychiatrists never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally examined. As a retired health professional who taught ethics this is Medical ethics 101. https://t.co/TNgS9yCrlq

@duty2warn The "Goldwater" rule applies here. "Duty to warn" is BS. there is no imminent threat. More liberal avoid the rules I don't like. But it does explain how unethical you are. https://t.co/FZk7QW6qYH

@oaktreedance @polly_strife @ProjectLincoln @TheRickWilson @DrOz Link: https://t.co/WDyLauxv3m

@DashDobrofsky The fundamental #moral principle is that nobody - even “top psychologists” - should ever provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally examined. This is not a moral principle you recognize, you hac

#LeSigh, because biology, and, by extension, the brain / mind, isn't a 100% thing in anything. A poison that kills one 200# adult male maybe only gives another gas pain. So saying a thing is DEFINITIVELY NOT another thing, in medicine, it's not normal / st

@jessesingal Now, about the issue of diagnosing someone you've never met - that's considered unethical (https://t.co/tlJEAmIMYd). But is that what those example tweets are doing? They are discussing a diagnosis Kanye reports, not making one themselves.

@SophiaWoroch @Zobyismyname @rosiedream @me_shelleylee @SamiraMiller Then you should have your "license" revoked. As an LPC, I firmly believe quacks that "diagnose" without ever seeing a patient discredit themselves and stain our profession. Hint: "traits"

@duty2warn https://t.co/vHBIRTEMxU

@ajohon @mmpadellan Too bad that's not how it works. It is unethical to diagnose a patient they are not treating https://t.co/yl7GRPtBJ3

@Maggie19951 @jamiedupree AMA needs to have a chat with you - https://t.co/DVnDGpwmQL

@votan_pacal @WeAreCanProud It's also unethical for psychologists to diagnose from afar. https://t.co/Sm8gioaYOw

@terrymbs2 @grannylater @RonnyJacksonTX https://t.co/gTb2bDCq5O

@GabiMccauley Umm…. https://t.co/i9Az1CDvh0

Is it ever ethical for doctors to diagnose patients they haven’t examined? https://t.co/AgjebSlfzA https://t.co/N7fXsZA2dw

@BadgerWThumbs They didn't risk anything except getting their asses kissed by their peers for saying something popular, despite the lack of ethics. https://t.co/pMRAbhttD3

Is it ever ethical for doctors to diagnose patients they haven019t examined? https://t.co/Ph7IUILGRG \Yale shrinks. Gave diagnosis not realizing IGs said I'd been harassed by mil Intel, I guilty of nothing. Intel returned & did it to me again. I NEVER

@UwUsiu @Rusherflyyy https://t.co/SP2WRqVyc4

@DylPar252 https://t.co/7CSsrhSZas

@afdsdn565 @GeorgeTakei @russ_hjelm It also violates ethics rules https://t.co/ruZDcRXzVN

@duty2warn Psychiatrists rendering diagnoses without examining the patient should have their licenses revoked. That and we're not a democracy. https://t.co/H1oAPPDZYj

@DrSamGirgis What does a demented person mean? : not able to think clearly or to understand what is real and what is not real: crazy or insane. Is it ever ethical for doctors to diagnose patients they haven’t examined?https://t.co/p4SRxz9BPQ

@MagooActual @The_JayTea @duty2warn None, because they follow the mental health evaluations that never should occur on a person more than ones that occur within the rules of the APA, coined the "Goldwater Rule". https://t.co/ALOT9qS40V

@DrSamGirgis Doctor, The Tongue of the wise brings healing. Is it ever ethical for doctors to diagnose patients they haven’t examined? Armchair diagnosis can also harm trust in the medical profession. https://t.co/p4SRxz9BPQ https://t.co/2gg8jDJIph

@realDailyWire @JaniceMcGeachin Perhaps Dr. Ronny Jackson should read this...https://t.co/3VIbECqHKZ

@thatsMrLewis @realDailyWire @brownell_rob My thoughts exactly! And, then there's this...https://t.co/3VIbECqHKZ

RT @DocNoyesRadio: @donmoyn @atrupar Here is an interesting read on why "Dr" Jackson maybe shouldn't do it...https://t.co/2e2VWpgUha

@donmoyn @atrupar Here is an interesting read on why "Dr" Jackson maybe shouldn't do it...https://t.co/2e2VWpgUha

@fiona_webster22 @KeithOlbermann With all due respect, Fiona -- please read this and feel free to comment: https://t.co/kIirTtZzyN

@s29b12 @Emma_hopie @KimShi45 @allkpop Well, sorry to break it to you but making diagnosis over a mere snippet is unethical. Well known psychiatrist you say? I think they're just out for clout. I advise you to READ MORE here: https://t.co/MavLGATmx9 http

RT @moonyeong10: “A proper diagnosis requires much more than “a review of television appearances, tweets, and public comments,”” https://t.…

RT @moonyeong10: I pointed this out last time. I just want to cite a source. #seoyeaji #seoyeji

RT @moonyeong10: “A proper diagnosis requires much more than “a review of television appearances, tweets, and public comments,”” https://t.…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

‼‼‼ THIS ‼‼‼ thats y cant believe y that specialist did that....

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

“A proper diagnosis requires much more than “a review of television appearances, tweets, and public comments,”” https://t.co/QZ37iPlLGI

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: I pointed this out last time. I just want to cite a source. #seoyeaji #seoyeji

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

RT @moonyeong10: “Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally exami…

I pointed this out last time. I just want to cite a source. #seoyeaji #seoyeji

“Psychiatrists should never provide professional opinions in the media about public figures they have not personally examined, the American Psychiatric Association reiterated in a statement.”https://t.co/QZ37iPlLGI

@MSNBC @RWPUSA @MSNBCDaily Because it's against the law you geniuses and highly unethical. #LiberalHypocrisy https://t.co/3rgEGMKIec

So @MSNBC absolutely should be fired! https://t.co/Cy58sGOdJK

@hershykershy @RealJamesWoods @govkristinoem Have you, personally, examined Joe Biden as a patient? No? Then you are either: 1. repeating false claims that you heard from other people. 2. an unethical medical professional diagnosing the patient they have

To anyone reading the articles re: diagnosing Trump, I also strongly recommend that you familiarize yourself with the 1973 Goldwater rule. (See NCBI article I just linked.) https://t.co/sT0I4wIpDS

@sullivanradio Found this when months ago the on air psychiatrists were trying to diagnose Trump. Is it ever ethical for doctors to diagnose patients they haven’t examined? https://t.co/Oy9dNZmYOQ

@Serenity2b @kaitlancollins Well then you must be familiar with the Goldwater Rule. https://t.co/wDSy3KaOJi

@shipwreckedcrew It isn't ethical for doctors to diagnose patients they haven’t examined https://t.co/vZilF3JBKF

@kenjeong Have you examined the patient? Are you channeling your inner doctor or comedian? https://t.co/iCyDjJZOAI

RT @shellielopez: @DrLeanaWen @realDonaldTrump Says the former head of the organization that sells baby body parts aka Planned Parenthood.…

@Rsnida @RealJamesWoods https://t.co/4sC9AZwe87