| Title |
Pareidolia and clinical reasoning: the pattern awakens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.151079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jared Baylis, Daniel K. Ting |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 41% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,078,586
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,504
of 9,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,969
of 396,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#26
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.