↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Pareidolia and clinical reasoning: the pattern awakens

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Pareidolia and clinical reasoning: the pattern awakens
Published in
CMAJ, December 2015
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.151079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jared Baylis, Daniel K. Ting

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#691,226
of 14,551,680 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#1,084
of 6,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,970
of 361,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#21
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,551,680 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.