| Title |
Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40–74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.180463 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott Klarenbach, Nicki Sims-Jones, Gabriela Lewin, Harminder Singh, Guylène Thériault, Marcello Tonelli, Marion Doull, Susan Courage, Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia, Brett D Thombs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 44 | 44% |
| United States | 9 | 9% |
| Argentina | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 28% |
| Scientists | 16 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 89 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 104 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 226. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#173,250
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#312
of 9,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,412
of 446,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#6
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.