↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Changes in public order after the opening of a medically supervised safer injecting facility for illicit injection drug users

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 5,356)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Changes in public order after the opening of a medically supervised safer injecting facility for illicit injection drug users
Published in
CMAJ, January 2004
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.1040774
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan Wood, Thomas Kerr, Will Small, Kathy Li, David C. Marsh, Julio S.G. Montaner, Mark W. Tyndall

Abstract

North America's first medically supervised safer injecting facility for illicit injection drug users was opened in Vancouver on Sept. 22, 2003. Although similar facilities exist in a number of European cities and in Sydney, Australia, no standardized evaluations of their impact have been presented in the scientific literature.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 107 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 34%
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 30%
Social Sciences 29 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Unspecified 13 11%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 416. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,082
of 11,599,579 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#33
of 5,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177
of 257,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#3
of 329 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,599,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 329 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.