@OldRedCedar @SallyMayweather Um, excuse me, Mr. Muppet, I think you have some science to read. https://t.co/N74xxcpeNv https://t.co/Gb1Wh8W74z review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05 https://t.co/wQHTyNx07n https://t.co/5bHlXZzuNd https://t.co/5DsX3l0
@VermeerEsther @sarahhorsepaste I apologize, Different twitter post I'm on. Here. https://t.co/HOBbD4uCxv https://t.co/8jd5aMlvsT https://t.co/Wvth3h3Acm https://t.co/ch1Wx1eUq8 https://t.co/DNt7fKdOjY https://t.co/9cWZ6qvwgj https://t.co/pb6CSkAUF7
@MrSausager @jojobo77 @kathryn_revell @JamesMelville You are clueless. Just a start of what I have https://t.co/HOBbD4uCxv https://t.co/8jd5aMlvsT https://t.co/Wvth3h3Acm https://t.co/ch1Wx1eUq8 https://t.co/DNt7fKdOjY https://t.co/9cWZ6qvwgj https:
@ColngStanley @RabbitohsForum @D_Melissa2 The are not effective against the protection of Covid and going back to original discussion they are not permitted for use in hospitals SURGEONS DO NOT WEAR THEM - IT IS AGAINST HOSPITAL POLICY. https://t.co/NI8AmA
@HighlyLogical1 @CDCgov @CDCMMWR In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, “no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) re
@DACDAC4DAC This subsequent meta-analysis is also interesting. "In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks." N95 better in experimental conditions, but no conclusion in real w
Everyone check out this dumbass who came at me with eight studies trying to tell me that masks don't work and all eight are either not relevant to the conversation at hand or actively undermine his point.
@Suzannah345 @meevalerie @sarahbeth345 https://t.co/Yoe0Pnw8wH “We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) lab
@Alexiabp22 @franc_silva33_ @DonaldJTrumpJr "we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absentee
@gorskon I’m up to three but I’m just a dumb normie. You gonna hit us with your super-convincing super-sciencey & totally non BS study to back up claims made by CDC of 50%+ cloth mask efficacy? https://t.co/1Lhpf1WI8t
@rachbarnhart No mask works against virus aerosols. Don't care what lab studies say. What do RCTs and real-world data say? https://t.co/PJ1GJGfTnP
@mcsheaspub @TomFitton " we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.” https://t.co/
@FOX9 Another! “There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator (N95) use and protection against influenza infection.” Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) CMAJ Mar 2016 https://t.co/dPNd7PmpQH
@SKastenbaum @drklausner @MonicaGandhi9 @USC @KCBSKCALDesk @KCBSRadio @jonandkenshow Except that plenty of research shows that their effectiveness in the laboratory does not translate into the real world. This is very common in medicine. I'm not sure why s
@bildungsfuchs @realTomBohn @WeltTv Das wurde schon vor Jahren aufgewärmt. Aber seit Covid scheint alles anders... https://t.co/ICNo1q6tYi https://t.co/YQS3o7FeHQ https://t.co/izv15NkhLc https://t.co/FaWB4jIovc https://t.co/RFmkgdc9dk https://t.co/jF
13) A 2017 meta-analysis of 23 studies and six controlled trials found, as did the current 2020 analysis, that yet again there was bias in studies that claimed masks provide protective benefits. https://t.co/r7PLHSNh5H
@katthair @KTNV @GovSisolak "...we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.” https:
@CorsIAQ Some disagree: “our meta-analysis showed…insufficient data to determine definitively whether N95 respirators are superior to surgical masks in protecting health care workers against transmissible acute respiratory infections in clinical settings.”
@kpbahrain @tamaravotes @DanCrenshawTX https://t.co/KG4cWE44CC https://t.co/rk8Zidr1cg https://t.co/6VyWHYeJBy I could go on. You do know the studies the CDC uses are widely available. Look them up. Figure out how to analyze them. Masks do not work, the
@TadeuszRo @BoleslawWalensa @GrzegorzGocini3 @AgataKowalskaTT Chętnie się zapoznam, ale nie mogę znaleźć, tylko jak niżej (interesuje mnie rzetelna wiedza). Wszyscy tu mówią o tajemniczych badaniach, tylko nikt nie chce podać źródła. To może Pan poda? ht
@BoleslawWalensa @GrzegorzGocini3 @AgataKowalskaTT Proszę bardzo, tutaj mam 2 metanalizy z naukowego źródła, w sumie 30 badań https://t.co/Xw4In1oca3 https://t.co/oEazYMzNjm Proszę odpowiedzieć równie rzetelnymi danymi (profil Konfederacji na SM się nie l
@OrsonHPGWelles @skepticalspice @MikePrysner meta-analysis shows no significant difference between medical masks, which are ineffective in reducing the spread of viruses, and N95 masks. https://t.co/q6VG7Grp6C https://t.co/es0xBnLkpe
RT @SWisdom718: @axiomatic13 @ClayTravis (2016) N-95 ineffective In meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies,found no sig. diff. between N95 r…
@axiomatic13 @ClayTravis (2016) N-95 ineffective In meta-analysis of 6 clinical studies,found no sig. diff. between N95 respirators & surgical masks in associated risk of (a)lab confirmed respiratory infection, (b)influenza-like illness, or (c)report
RT @nvrlos4words: Who said there was no mask science, this is the NIH in 2016 https://t.co/PImK19bHPr NPR knew in 2012 masks do not work w…
Who said there was no mask science, this is the NIH in 2016 https://t.co/PImK19bHPr NPR knew in 2012 masks do not work with their work on, Black Lung: Why Respirators Are Not A Solution https://t.co/8A5lPRtITH CDC knew for a 100 years https://t.co/1tMaQN
@6fores1 @TheEliKlein I don't like homework assignments, especially on Twitter, but here's the results of a quick search. https://t.co/VMPJYgCWZV https://t.co/QV5e3Yd7Tm https://t.co/wB4EyXvMog https://t.co/gifbSeuR2D
@BrockTheFree https://t.co/5C8Nnd5vKd I feel ya but Here is a list..not all on C19 but I have about 10 more in my bookmarks I'll find later..the research world has plenty of studies..just none they wanted to site..bc politics.
@skabowl @sabatier71 @Libraruam2021 @cogsog @AndrewLawton It doesn't protect others. https://t.co/HawM1pAHsZ https://t.co/TpK1so3FjT https://t.co/em22CxPuZw
@triplebeamjesus @substratenfts CMAJ Mar 2016 https://t.co/yeGm2i9iHs “We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of
@DaveJohnT @triggerpod @bariweiss A few that Sky missed for some reason: https://t.co/KWl6aCgAaA https://t.co/llzwBl6fFt https://t.co/uW5cmOpdf6 https://t.co/aWLRm7KRBp https://t.co/obdM8zlJF4
@BornInOttawa @TopoChi59889561 @Upgradez @mhdksafa "we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place a
@logosaetos @DavidVeillon5 @Quicktake @dreocalonzo Another 1 Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ
@JamesSurowiecki You could just Google stuff like most of the world. https://t.co/K2DhK2FM4o https://t.co/xRxmvzGjJZ
RT @fingerspitz: Results of our systematic review and meta-analysis show that there was no significant difference between N95 respirators a…
Results of our systematic review and meta-analysis show that there was no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks when used by health care workers to prevent transmission of acute respiratory infections from patients. https://t.c
@DropletsAreFake @notrealyo @byua99 "...we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”
@JoeBiden 2009: https://t.co/N74xxcpeNv 2010: https://t.co/Gb1Wh8W74z review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05 2012: https://t.co/o5zK7qEUPv 2015: https://t.co/wQHTyNx07n 2016: https://t.co/5bHlXZzuNd 2017: https://t.co/5DsX3l0vLz 2019: https://t.co/xFLiZmd
2009: https://t.co/N74xxcpeNv 2010: https://t.co/Gb1Wh8W74z review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05 2012: https://t.co/o5zK7qEUPv 2015: https://t.co/wQHTyNx07n 2016: https://t.co/5bHlXZzuNd 2017: https://t.co/5DsX3l0vLz 2019: https://t.co/xFLiZmdVrt 2020:
@Pburgess1971 @HarborMom @GetTFVaccinated @PinkRantz @BurnItWithFire8 https://t.co/HgF6qU0eOd https://t.co/yf6JVf6K05 https://t.co/bAEnSI9ADG Here's three, You want more?
@goldenbeer0 @TeeAda12 @Chessidharta @chess24com Actually there are plenty of studies, but i guess you just never tried gard enough, oh well https://t.co/1eh0iZYUiq
RT @AJKayWriter: Here’s my 5 min search results just now: 2016 Review = Insufficient data that N95s are better for viral trans than surgi…
RT @AJKayWriter: Here’s my 5 min search results just now: 2016 Review = Insufficient data that N95s are better for viral trans than surgi…
RT @AJKayWriter: Here’s my 5 min search results just now: 2016 Review = Insufficient data that N95s are better for viral trans than surgi…
RT @AJKayWriter: Here’s my 5 min search results just now: 2016 Review = Insufficient data that N95s are better for viral trans than surgi…
RT @AJKayWriter: Here’s my 5 min search results just now: 2016 Review = Insufficient data that N95s are better for viral trans than surgi…
RT @AJKayWriter: Here’s my 5 min search results just now: 2016 Review = Insufficient data that N95s are better for viral trans than surgi…
RT @AJKayWriter: Here’s my 5 min search results just now: 2016 Review = Insufficient data that N95s are better for viral trans than surgi…
Here’s my 5 min search results just now: 2016 Review = Insufficient data that N95s are better for viral trans than surgical in clinical settings https://t.co/1uIVS1cnxk 2020 Meta-analysis = N95s similar protection against viral trans as medical masks
Canadian N95 mask study https://t.co/lrWymMACRn https://t.co/gF5LoA3Ru7
RT @lj_evl: @ShowinyaUsa @TomFitton "...we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of…
@ShowinyaUsa @TomFitton "...we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.” https://t.
@ianmSC The idea that N95s are some sort of impenetrable force against viruses is absolute nonsense. Most RCTs involving N95s in health care settings show no benefit. No mask is effective against aerosols. https://t.co/PJ1GJGxufn
RT @zbr101: https://t.co/vMLPKQuz41 “Although N95 respirators appeared to have a protective advantage over surgical masks in laboratory se…
https://t.co/vMLPKQuz41 “Although N95 respirators appeared to have a protective advantage over surgical masks in laboratory settings, our meta-analysis showed that there were insufficient data to determine definitively whether N95 respirators are superior
@bombaycat899 @AnAwakeNPC @nytimes In a 2016 meta-analysis, it was found that both randomized controlled trials and observational studies of N95 respirators and surgical masks used by healthcare workers did not show benefit against transmission of acute re
@kare11 they will do nothing but be a another boondoggle. They are single use, and no more effective than a surgical mask. https://t.co/DbXSkcsTQd
@1989_BMW_325i @ProgressiveG2 @thraxman2 @erinnyc @mackyson ...our meta-analysis showed that there were insufficient data to determine definitively whether N95 respirators are superior to surgical masks in protecting health care workers against transmissib
@droidsteve66 @Razzl3_d @skennyvegan Although N95 respirators appeared to have an advantage over surgical 😷 in lab settings, they couldn’t determine definitively whether N95 respirators are superior in protecting HCW against transmissible acute respiratory
@WinfieldForUS “There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator (N95) use and protection against influenza infection.” https://t.co/dPNd7PmpQH
Masks don’t work.
@Vince_Delta Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”
@LawrenceGostin "There were 17 eligible studies…None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator (N95)use and protection against influenza infection.” https://t.co/dPNd7PE0If
RT @Senor__Sanchez: “we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-con…