RT @KAkosombo: @booyah2yah @kevinnbass Respirators and surgical mask are the same rubbish, there's plenty of evidence 👇🏼 CDC https://t.co/…
Las FFP2 y la mascarilla normalita son la misma mierda
@booyah2yah @kevinnbass Respirators and surgical mask are the same rubbish, there's plenty of evidence 👇🏼 CDC https://t.co/l9OK5oOStL https://t.co/mfV4kpqQPC https://t.co/8vqI5Zbv48 https://t.co/bQJcbx89td
@ChanasitJonas für medizinisches Personal ist mE auch nix mit FFP2 zu holen es gibt verblindete Studien mit dem besagten Personenkreis, Masken wurden fit-tested unter Anleitung getragen
@ManifestWestony @ScholerinED @CDCgov Wes, this guy is a clown don't waste your time. But if you need some sources for other people who pose as academics grab any of these links https://t.co/kAAd1Ztmao
@denpamonkey39ra ●Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/U9yUuIORWx
@DrJBhattacharya old knowledge, really old knowledge
@aftab_usa Use curbside pickup. Please. It’s the only good thing to come of the pandemic for us anti social people. I’d hate for it to end because of lack of participation. plus, your masks won’t protect you. https://t.co/USaaXafRyn
@PCLong1 @oregoncitizen_ randomized controlled trials and observational studies of N95 respirators and surgical masks used by healthcare workers did not show benefit against transmission transmission https://t.co/Af5lMW5KB7
@Donsmith524 I mean you can go by the study used, or face facts https://t.co/soQfA56HoL https://t.co/ApDjhSlDBh
@Loretta_Torrago @EmilyL73453 @Napoleonkjp1 @ltg1810 @Amal4Solutions @LizHighleyman That's not what this pre Covid study found https://t.co/bk9IxkHP64
@daveshow6 @k9icu @SalvMattera It does help to know the difference, which you clearly do not. https://t.co/iTbXKhlhM7 https://t.co/IwkoEpZnJC https://t.co/RjhtiuVltU
@scott_squires They work? https://t.co/Ctt8Mwb1jp https://t.co/E529gI6ucT https://t.co/WladwRO5Ag https://t.co/iUxoyNwVpt And that’s just a few to show…they don’t work 🤡
@HeadbanginLegnd @1NewsNZ So you read all of the links in that review? https://t.co/Ze1kqpFc3g ; https://t.co/ijlzaM6FYN ; https://t.co/41W4DWr9ZM ; https://t.co/LOMViWgnc3 ; https://t.co/2eURIn26rt ; https://t.co/qJclZBjW3e ; https://t.co/IzdiS0DIIK - the
@TactNowInfo @dockaurG Not one of them saw any reduction in transmission vs unmasked, INCLUDING N95 masks. https://t.co/N8edwcU608 https://t.co/al2Itds6aW https://t.co/TB1c2atWmv https://t.co/nkZ4FyG4IN https://t.co/SVodcUUy6H https://t.co/QvFw8pc5jK
@naner81 @DylanShandley @Erinn2ns @rumin8z @gettnhotnhere @EpiEllie Prior to all of medical history being tossed aside for the covid madness. https://t.co/WZwNL9WIvS
@jillneimark @houmanhemmati @kevinnbass n95 respirators in hospital settings make sense, but when worn by the public, they give a false sense of security, given most wear them incorrectly & they’re absolutely inappropriate for people with health condit
RT @kathiroussel: @kevinnbass For those who argue n95s are better https://t.co/HMSZmKSkLr https://t.co/iFqmYlqsVK
@kevinnbass For those who argue n95s are better https://t.co/HMSZmKSkLr https://t.co/iFqmYlqsVK
@DocDeezWhat He did say studies on masks.....so here... https://t.co/mly1HPe0Gm
@masking__mama @Mrmangajojo "Although N95 respirators appeared to have a protective adv over surgical masks in labs ... insufficient data to determine N95 respirators are superior to surgical in protecting HCW agst transmissible acute respiratory infection
@2022onward @mercurial_moons @ohbutwhatashame #5 2016 meta-analysis - both randomized controlled trials and observational studies of N95 respirators & surgical masks used by healthcare workers did not show benefit against transmission of acute respirat
https://t.co/tyjIsuLGeb “We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis ... we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) ILI, or (c) reported work-
@beornnmccarthy @thereal_truther Some more science for you Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ M
@OneKyleAway @truth_finder40 @Timcast They were never effective against viruses. N95 masks are not even effective without a full MOP suite. https://t.co/OaPPNfxxnE https://t.co/WFxnivUy3m https://t.co/57Hs8CydSr https://t.co/9Vu273Xypv https://t.co/ooGAh
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 5: https://t.co/IIlYcatfxH “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care worker…
@VictorLicata1 @BeyondTheNews63 @slikrik2003 Numerous studies from reliable organizations call into question the efficacy of masks in reducing the spread of respiratory viruses. https://t.co/om0kLlnYYm https://t.co/nN7S1kg2Ox https://t.co/Fffmz514yT https:
@AK4WA Sadly, all the science going back decades says all masks, including N95 type (without a full suit), increase your chances of viral infection as much as 40%. These are the most recent. 2015: https://t.co/OaPPNfxxnE 2016: https://t.co/WFxnivUy3m 2
@tangereina @UnRepConsrvtive @NicoleM93847946 @SparklesNSunsh2 @libsoftiktok @MiddleboroughPS When masks do absolutely nothing to protect from viruses and increase the chances of viral infection by up to 40% and any infection by over 50%. They are absolut
@HeyNurseKat @AnnaSova17 @jonathanstea Link is not broken. https://t.co/CYGMzxMfGi
@smurfsj @Africanconcrete @AlixG_2 @Zels77 I was going to clown you with actual primary sources like 1 https://t.co/BDhourAdYf 2 https://t.co/tnu6PyJujH 3 https://t.co/KuGyVGl0b1 4 https://t.co/Fyzb3PFcpR and 5 https://t.co/NDfwWDRBlJ BUT who needs th
@GrantAcosta5 @danielkotzin infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis”, Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2016, cmaj.150835 https://t.co/eYbiSR3Hs0: “We identified 6 clinical studies ... In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we fou
Going back to 2006, 09-12,16,19,20 all come to the same conclusions. Masks NEVER worked. Anyone could have looked this up. 2020 https://t.co/NitSvcv3Q9 2019 https://t.co/qNWa9ld0wT 2016 https://t.co/bMH3Em47n7 2010 https://t.co/dsxuY2r9Yg 2006
@KennethJOath @jwindheim @mikelayfield77 @HSophia75 @ProudPatriot247 @krassenstein https://t.co/1wySZhjtBh This study didn’t look at Covid. Just one and it was the first one I looked at.
How odd. Studies in 2009-12,16,19,20 all come to the same conclusions. Masks don't work. 2020 https://t.co/NitSvcvBFH 2019 https://t.co/qNWa9ldymr 2016 https://t.co/bMH3Em4FcF 2010 https://t.co/dsxuY2rHNO 2006 https://t.co/MpyENdSygK
@DirtybirdTerre1 @KatherinePrange @FoxNews Ok, here we go! 1. Effectiveness of cloth masks, which CDC said was effective! Lie! https://t.co/ZJeWMzCubl 2. Surgical Masks work! Lie! Even the manufacturers told EVERYONE it can't stop Covid-19, so they put i
@Mil3sDyson @masking__mama @IanCopeland5 "...we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absentee
@DJJonnyTravieso @PlH14482853 @DaveyMavey90 @trishgreenhalgh #6 https://t.co/Jh1bsQW1Vv searched electronic dbes & grey literature for relevant studies pub'd from 1/1990 to 12/2014. Paraphrasing its conclusion: 'No significant difference between N95 &a
@arijitchakrav @mamasaurusMeg @reflectfirst @rkfmiller Did the design of these masks change since 2016? If not, then how do we “know”? https://t.co/ntiyC8QO0G
@TruePatriot8472 @ClownWorld_ 2016 Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/E9cLuv1bEo
@EffTexas @hannah_ockerman @cathyrusson " we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism
@Jeffmitchelmit @healthbyjames https://t.co/FaRX2o3fA8 Our meta-analysis showed that there were insufficient data to determine definitively whether N95 respirators are superior to surgical masks in protecting health care workers against transmissible acut
@healthbyjames 2) 2016 Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/E9cLuv1JtW
@healthbyjames No. Studies in 2009-12,16,19,20 all come to the same conclusions. 2020 https://t.co/2HyGjbqDFP 2019 https://t.co/TQiqBxLaNS 2016 https://t.co/GXyEK8q0Kv 2010 https://t.co/VNHdx1vybT 2006 https://t.co/OWqM6YzYrv
@vmarino @zipthelip987123 @SGamble1234 @TaraBull808 @ThTh72201958 2) 2016 Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/E9cLuv1
@hangry_dad @Doctor_Eric_B @Ram1725 @brownstoneinst would you first agree that surgical masks have no place in PPE for a respiratory virus? then, https://t.co/otsK0WkFC5 see "results" in the "abstract" - this is 2016, prior to nonsense studies corrupted
2016 meta-analysis: N95/ffp2 vs 'baggy blues' = no difference https://t.co/z9sYXY7PlJ