| Title |
Neonatal outcomes after influenza immunization during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.110754 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark C Steinhoff, Saad B Omer, Eliza Roy, Shams El Arifeen, Rubhana Raqib, Caitlin Dodd, Robert F Breiman, K Zaman |
| Abstract |
There are limited data about the effect of maternal influenza infection on fetuses and newborns. We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Mother's Gift project, a randomized study designed to test the effectiveness of inactivated influenza and pneumococcal vaccines during pregnancy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| Canada | 5 | 19% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 452. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#60,058
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#114
of 9,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197
of 161,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.