↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Neonatal outcomes after influenza immunization during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 6,480)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Neonatal outcomes after influenza immunization during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
CMAJ, February 2012
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.110754
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. C. Steinhoff, S. B. Omer, E. Roy, S. E. Arifeen, R. Raqib, C. Dodd, R. F. Breiman, K. Zaman

Abstract

There are limited data about the effect of maternal influenza infection on fetuses and newborns. We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Mother's Gift project, a randomized study designed to test the effectiveness of inactivated influenza and pneumococcal vaccines during pregnancy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Malawi 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 121 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 18 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 450. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#22,188
of 14,162,689 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#41
of 6,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 121,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#1
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,162,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.