↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Intramedullary cervical spinal mass after stem cell transplantation using an olfactory mucosal cell autograft

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
89 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Intramedullary cervical spinal mass after stem cell transplantation using an olfactory mucosal cell autograft
Published in
CMAJ, July 2019
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.181696
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire F. Woodworth, Gregory Jenkins, Jane Barron, Nanette Hache

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#67,674
of 13,230,555 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#157
of 6,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,225
of 154,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,230,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.