Title |
Risk of rhabdomyolysis with donepezil compared with rivastigmine or galantamine: a population-based cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.190337 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jamie L Fleet, Eric McArthur, Aakil Patel, Matthew A Weir, Manuel Montero-Odasso, Amit X Garg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 12 | 15% |
Spain | 12 | 15% |
United States | 8 | 10% |
Japan | 3 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
Saint Barthélemy | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 36 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 64 | 80% |
Scientists | 8 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 28% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 322. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#103,077
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#191
of 9,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,978
of 347,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.