| Title |
Injectable opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder: a national clinical guideline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.190344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia Fairbairn, Josey Ross, Michael Trew, Karine Meador, Jeff Turnbull, Scott MacDonald, Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes, Bernard Le Foll, Marie-Ève Goyer, Michel Perreault, Christy Sutherland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 76 | 54% |
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Djibouti | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 58% |
| Scientists | 29 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 318. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#107,644
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#199
of 9,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,086
of 356,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.