↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study
Published in
CMAJ, October 2019
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.190366
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulia M. Muraca, Shiliang Liu, Yasser Sabr, Sarka Lisonkova, Amanda Skoll, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W. Cundiff, Olof Stephansson, Neda Razaz, K.S. Joseph

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Social Sciences 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#79,332
of 14,091,558 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#175
of 6,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,287
of 314,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#6
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,091,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.