↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

THROMBOCYTOPENIA AS A MANIFESTATION OF POISONING.

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, June 1934
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 6,260)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2434 tweeters
Title
THROMBOCYTOPENIA AS A MANIFESTATION OF POISONING.
Published in
CMAJ, June 1934
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.G.N.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,434 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1254. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,546
of 13,778,946 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#3
of 6,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123
of 224,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#1
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,778,946 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.