↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Complementing chronic frailty assessment at hospital admission with an electronic frailty index (FI-Laboratory) comprising routine blood test results

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
95 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Complementing chronic frailty assessment at hospital admission with an electronic frailty index (FI-Laboratory) comprising routine blood test results
Published in
CMAJ, January 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.190952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugh Logan Ellis, Bettina Wan, Michael Yeung, Arshad Rather, Imran Mannan, Catherine Bond, Catherine Harvey, Nadia Raja, Peter Dutey-Magni, Kenneth Rockwood, Daniel Davis, Samuel D. Searle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#144,652
of 14,322,412 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#337
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,304
of 287,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#12
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,412 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.