↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Development and validation of the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Development and validation of the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score
Published in
CMAJ, February 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.190757
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rupert A. Payne, Silvia C. Mendonca, Marc N. Elliott, Catherine L. Saunders, Duncan A. Edwards, Martin Marshall, Martin Roland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#151,626
of 14,330,275 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#355
of 6,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,956
of 162,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,330,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.