| Title |
The mirage of universality: Canada’s failure to act on social policy and health care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.200085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Boozary, Andreas Laupacis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 427 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 249 | 58% |
| United States | 15 | 4% |
| Djibouti | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 280 | 66% |
| Scientists | 65 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 64 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 354. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#92,808
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#165
of 9,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,320
of 476,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#7
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.