↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Clinical guideline for homeless and vulnerably housed people, and people with lived homelessness experience

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
271 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Clinical guideline for homeless and vulnerably housed people, and people with lived homelessness experience
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.190777
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Pottie, Claire E Kendall, Tim Aubry, Olivia Magwood, Anne Andermann, Ginetta Salvalaggio, David Ponka, Gary Bloch, Vanessa Brcic, Eric Agbata, Kednapa Thavorn, Terry Hannigan, Andrew Bond, Susan Crouse, Ritika Goel, Esther Shoemaker, Jean Zhuo Jing Wang, Sebastian Mott, Harneel Kaur, Christine Mathew, Syeda Shanza Hashmi, Ammar Saad, Thomas Piggott, Neil Arya, Nicole Kozloff, Michaela Beder, Dale Guenter, Wendy Muckle, Stephen Hwang, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Peter Tugwell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 271 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 68 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 15%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Psychology 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 70 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 270. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#134,548
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#250
of 9,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,067
of 388,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#12
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.