| Title |
Efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma for severe COVID-19 based on evidence in other severe respiratory viral infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.200642 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niveditha Devasenapathy, Zhikang Ye, Mark Loeb, Fang Fang, Borna Tadayon Najafabadi, Yingqi Xiao, Rachel Couban, Philippe Bégin, Gordon Guyatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 16% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| Chile | 4 | 6% |
| Peru | 3 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 18% |
| Scientists | 10 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 309 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 72 | 23% |
| Unknown | 93 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 117 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 529. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#48,120
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#89
of 9,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,047
of 426,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.