| Title |
Reporting of financial conflicts of interest by Canadian clinical practice guideline producers: a descriptive study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.191737 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharine Elder, Kimberly A Turner, Lisa Cosgrove, Joel Lexchin, Adrienne Shnier, Ainsley Moore, Sharon Straus, Brett D Thombs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 270 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 61 | 23% |
| United States | 28 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 10% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 110 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 180 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 43 | 16% |
| Scientists | 40 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#200,092
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#362
of 9,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,760
of 434,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#8
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.