↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Reporting of financial conflicts of interest by Canadian clinical practice guideline producers: a descriptive study

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
315 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Reporting of financial conflicts of interest by Canadian clinical practice guideline producers: a descriptive study
Published in
CMAJ, June 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.191737
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharine Elder, Kimberly A. Turner, Lisa Cosgrove, Joel Lexchin, Adrienne Shnier, Ainsley Moore, Sharon Straus, Brett D. Thombs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 315 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 247. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#66,804
of 15,576,551 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#152
of 6,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,417
of 284,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#4
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,576,551 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.