@aexebradapll @Estacadebares @pessimist92548 Retractado y baneado de por vida de la medicina de UK: https://t.co/YOffp3mVjE https://t.co/lAm0mWD9iu
@stkirsch I hope you get sued for defamation by "all top autism docs". Autism develops in a child long before they reach an age to be vaccinated for MMR diseases. You can be autistic whether you are vaccinated or unvaccinated because vaccines do not cause
@JMM_2020 @LtCdData Paper was retracted and proven wrong since the disbarred "doctor" was paid to write his papers in favor of unlicensed and unscrupulous grifters selling snake oil to desperate parents. https://t.co/Epe4xv4caH
RT @leos: Las vacunas no causan TEA. Esta noción estaba basada en un solo paper que ya fue retractado y no se ha encontrado evidencia desde…
RT @leos: Las vacunas no causan TEA. Esta noción estaba basada en un solo paper que ya fue retractado y no se ha encontrado evidencia desde…
RT @leos: Las vacunas no causan TEA. Esta noción estaba basada en un solo paper que ya fue retractado y no se ha encontrado evidencia desde…
Las vacunas no causan TEA. Esta noción estaba basada en un solo paper que ya fue retractado y no se ha encontrado evidencia desde entonces de que haya alguna asociación entre las dos cosas. https://t.co/CDitJ7AirA
@SergioFelperin @GamarnikLab Ese estudio fue retractado (o sea, retirado). No recuerdo la razón aunque muy posiblemente sea manoseo de la data (iba a decir sesgar la muestra cosa que dé lo que pretendo) https://t.co/kutYjWJNm8
@AFdeMoura @schrarstzhaupt Invwstigaram em 2004 e mantiveram o artigo...o que mudou? https://t.co/hMUHK8qgxA https://t.co/ZR6pSPaBDu
British Scientists Have Jolly Good Imaginations Piltdown Man: Infamous Fake Fossil https://t.co/DDk9jXEZN3 Live Science Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines By Laura Eggertson https://t.co/sqqi2hGpxl CMAJ. 2010 Mar 9; 182(4)
@boyzwillbe_ @brandorobertsdc @stopvaccinating He did not falsify data. It was retracted 12 years after publication--six years after The Lancet has investigated criticisms the first time and found no reason to retract. https://t.co/53AAWZuFAi
@popcorn_dust @CaulfieldTim @jonathanstea @MediaSmarts @ScienceUpFirst @mcgillu @CMHA_NTL @StanKutcher @DrShazmaMithani @doritmi Even the Lancet retracts articles from time to time: https://t.co/HGQwF1Q1LT
@HopiNg66966500 @DrJBhattacharya @drsimonegold @ZelenkoZev @DrJamesOlsson @P_McCulloughMD @SenShaneJettOK @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD @ElonMuskAOC @dezzie_rezzie The one study that purported a correlation between vaccines and autism - Wakefield - was disc
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
@HerbsandDirt @merchantyang @Bigjohn833 @SarahGeving1 🤦🏻♀️ Why do you want to defend such a lying grifter as Wakefield? If you knew anything about medical studies, you would know that a sample size of 12 is not anything to base any big claims on. https://
@jrs_1202 @jonstewart @RobertKennedyJr The Lancet article was retracted (in 2010) 12y after publication, or rather, 12y late. The article should have never been published in the first place because the methodology in the paper was wrong. Science's problem
@MB888888888888 @hoosiercommish https://t.co/2NMlIwLS6g https://t.co/puaWUxUE07 https://t.co/j8f53wmSwW While I'm not a medical professional nor a researcher, I do understand the importance of research. Here are a few sources that might be helpful as you l
@Ivona58142082 @JakubHlavka A tohle jste cetla? Nebo Vam to Vase zdroje zatajily? https://t.co/UPuMhA3oCD
@dimitri_von @Liberty_ROC https://t.co/p30ax55Cm0 and the mixing of muscle relaxants instead of saline into the vaccines by nurses caused this particular event. Bobby is calling for testing and verifiable safety, and proper protocols, not exclusion
RT @RalbrechtTroy: Much energy expended upon unfalsifiable science. The falsifiable, demonstrable,repeatable & PRd science facts.. https:…
Much energy expended upon unfalsifiable science. The falsifiable, demonstrable,repeatable & PRd science facts.. https://t.co/u0j8IOGJea https://t.co/WiE7aMmDOu https://t.co/hqc5VozJ4C https://t.co/KUQpfOIeFM
@stopvaccinating NOPE Your material as well as false; getting really stale…. NOTE HOW WE CITE-Give it a go on occasion. https://t.co/rPgq0qKYyv https://t.co/OArdZXmoOv
NOPE Your material as well as false; getting really stale…. https://t.co/VFYTIv21rY https://t.co/9CWjVhrgdr
@camjenglish @cjsnowdon Do you mean with press the Lancet? https://t.co/32YVSbttW6
@KH118118 During this time, she defended herself saying that the data was correct. https://t.co/kLIFm3iwUS Let's consider the data or let's consider the argument from authority (the magazine did not retract).
Don't forget that mistakes happen, and they take time to undo. https://t.co/kLIFm3iwUS Analyze the data. Look at the methodological and ethical problems!
@Reality7717 @TammieMcDonal17 Sorry, madame asshole, but you cited the Lancet, who are infamous for making up fake reports that cite anti-vax positions. https://t.co/KgEvuDsghj
@jonathanstea Please recall that the Lancet published Dr Wakefield's crap paper about autism being caused by vaccines. And it took 12 YEARS for them to retract the 'study'. https://t.co/v2wND0fFFl
Hi Adam, how are you? I think we should analyze the data and not use arguments from authority. How important is Chief Editor advocacy? mistakes happen: https://t.co/kLIFm3iwUS remembering that the magazine defended itself by saying that the data was v
@PooterNDaWolf @USMortality Oh did the WEF support this? https://t.co/YrlHJCoJW4
RT @draevans: The Lancet withdrew a paper that linked autism to MMR. The consequences of that paper still persist to this day despite over…
The Lancet withdrew a paper that linked autism to MMR. The consequences of that paper still persist to this day despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary https://t.co/jEPDXyONyf
@chrito4robert @30ACTruth @Inversionism @elonmusk As with everything else, wait long enough, and beliefs will be challenged. https://t.co/MIuF0RRA1B
@JonSnow50616798 @emzorbit @MaxKennerly @mmfa Nobody's pushing boosters for MMR, and nobody had experience with "getting autism from it." Pay attention to what's being said, not just your script. The antivax movement caught fire 25 yrs ago with Wakefield d
@DanielS90171419 @PhilHol51637269 @curryja That was a long time ago — it's fascinating how some things just really stick, even after being proven, time and time again, to be false. (Can't find anything about an adult entertainer, though!) https://t.co/ncBh
@unhealthytruth So why then was he struck off by the GMC? He faked his research a disgraceful situation when people’s lives & health was at stake https://t.co/w0Mf6LvTYd
RT @robhanjr: @IanCopeland5 And the "study" that started the lie of autism being created by a vaccine was shown to be complete b******* ht…
@IanCopeland5 And the "study" that started the lie of autism being created by a vaccine was shown to be complete b******* https://t.co/VqTLQ53zZK
@NBCNews This Lancet? Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://t.co/WmybQ7DKIe
@M1066R @A1an_M @DocAhmadMalik Hmmmm - not sure you are correct there. https://t.co/bv41llTN6Z
RT @Alestezzicussa3: Uno studio di 12 anni fa sulla correlazione tra vaccini e autismo è stato ritirato. Quando vi diranno che non ci sono…
RT @Alestezzicussa3: Uno studio di 12 anni fa sulla correlazione tra vaccini e autismo è stato ritirato. Quando vi diranno che non ci sono…
Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines - PMC #sunday https://t.co/BDldxTr9jo
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
RT @RPLerias: @DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scienti…
@DavidAshleyDavi It only took them TWELVE years to retract the 'vaccines cause autism' fake paper, they clearly value scientific facts. /s https://t.co/CIVQb55DJp https://t.co/k2WiiUybcz
@Nata12743550311 @JariMikkonen0 Sen lisäksi hän peukaloi dataansa saadakseen sen näyttämään siltä, että autismin ja rokotteen välillä olisi jokin yhteys. Hän valehtelustaan kiinni ja Lancet veti julkaisun pois. Wakefield menetti lääkärinoikeutensa ansaitus
@ChuckBruce45 @DiedSuddenly_ Knock yourself out: https://t.co/0LMr0Lj35t https://t.co/8H7UmgW7cy https://t.co/8H7UmgW7cy https://t.co/hx7uDAIlj8. https://t.co/98tYBnJoEY I could go on, but you aren't one who has the capacity to read.
@PaulGBrandon @charlesadler @uppitybitxh By 2000, measles was considered eradicated in N.A. thanks to the MMR vaccine. The more gullible found Dr. Wakefield's (now completely debunked) 1998 paper linking it to Autism. RWNJs started the dirty snowball ro
@TCovid1984 @Vali_Ghincolov Nu-i chiar asa. A venit de la un articol publicat in '98 in The Lancet care a fost retras dupa ce s-a aflat ca autorul a folosit copii alesi special ca sa rezulte acest efect: https://t.co/hnZgoa1UDh
@TheRealLoniHull @jonathanstea @LukeKenneth3 The "study" that started that BS has been repeatedly debunked. Try actually doing your own research sometime. It can keep you from looking foolish. https://t.co/sxmyhlvPlh
@bertil_hatt @ccanonne_ @shortstein @arxiv The anti-vax movement didn't kick off because of ArXiV, it kicked off because of a peer-reviewed journal publication (https://t.co/HkwIGMniz4)
@santaklos70 @patricksavalle Ja hoor. De schrijver van het artikel die dit gerucht de wereld in hielp, heeft het teruggetrokken. https://t.co/YkhGZQaDIx
@PostvanFenna Dat artikel is al heel erg lang “retracted” door de @TheLancet https://t.co/sTRszTuRis Wakefield heeft fraude gepleegd uit winstbejag en belangenverstrengeling en is berispt.
RT @collapsologist: 9. Hoe kun je iets goed onderzoeken als onwelgevallige resultaten niet of nauwelijks gepubliceerd worden en er professi…
@AngiesKnowing @ICU1010 @catturd2 https://t.co/gA48w2HMj1. This was when the singular paper that caused this vaccine-autism nonsense was retracted over a decade ago. While the paper itself was from over 20 years ago.
RT @NedaaAlkhamis: قمة المهزله لانسيت تتراجع عن مقالة عمرها 12 عامًا تربط التوحد بلقاحات MMR. بعد 12 عامًا من نشر دراسة تاريخية حولت عشرات…
RT @NedaaAlkhamis: قمة المهزله لانسيت تتراجع عن مقالة عمرها 12 عامًا تربط التوحد بلقاحات MMR. بعد 12 عامًا من نشر دراسة تاريخية حولت عشرات…
RT @NedaaAlkhamis: قمة المهزله لانسيت تتراجع عن مقالة عمرها 12 عامًا تربط التوحد بلقاحات MMR. بعد 12 عامًا من نشر دراسة تاريخية حولت عشرات…
RT @NedaaAlkhamis: قمة المهزله لانسيت تتراجع عن مقالة عمرها 12 عامًا تربط التوحد بلقاحات MMR. بعد 12 عامًا من نشر دراسة تاريخية حولت عشرات…
RT @NedaaAlkhamis: قمة المهزله لانسيت تتراجع عن مقالة عمرها 12 عامًا تربط التوحد بلقاحات MMR. بعد 12 عامًا من نشر دراسة تاريخية حولت عشرات…
RT @NedaaAlkhamis: قمة المهزله لانسيت تتراجع عن مقالة عمرها 12 عامًا تربط التوحد بلقاحات MMR. بعد 12 عامًا من نشر دراسة تاريخية حولت عشرات…
RT @NedaaAlkhamis: قمة المهزله لانسيت تتراجع عن مقالة عمرها 12 عامًا تربط التوحد بلقاحات MMR. بعد 12 عامًا من نشر دراسة تاريخية حولت عشرات…
قمة المهزله لانسيت تتراجع عن مقالة عمرها 12 عامًا تربط التوحد بلقاحات MMR. بعد 12 عامًا من نشر دراسة تاريخية حولت عشرات الآلاف من الآباء حول العالم ضد لقاح الحصبة والنكاف والحصبة الألمانية بسبب ارتباط ضمني بين التطعيمات والتوحد تراجعت The Lancet عن الورقة
@patriottakes I mean... Come on!! https://t.co/SsPB3Aa1Su
still influence parents decisions today & had a ripple effect leading to an explosion of anti-vaxxers. To joke about the joys of spreading misinformation, especially as the head of a major social media platform is evil to say the least. (2/2) https://t
@gabrielfojo @Eugenia_ar_ @Lilolilium Sí que sabe de lo que está hablando. Como sé yo y te ilustro para q vos t informes también. El pedorro paper del delincuente de Andrew Wakefield, originalmente publicado por The Lancet, fue retractado el 02/02/2010, 12
@ihatefish2 @DammMichelle @ryancduff @Ann94418634 @DiedSuddenly_ Their retractions go on and on when it comes to vaccine safety because Gates funds them and his money is all in vaccines. He announced he made half a billion on Covid vaccine$. Autism IS caus
@DrJayRichards @ishapiro @TheLancet The Lancet waited 12 years to retract their publication linking the MMR vaccine to autism which gave support to anti-vaxxer loons like Jenny McCarthy. The fact that anyone finds them credible is quite shocking. https://
RT @FNUParul: Came across this article! Made realise that how much one wrong/rushed research can impact the receptivity to treatment and in…
@avatans @mairal @vmurthy77 @Twitter https://t.co/yZQC87VPO1 Yes. The ‘MMR vaccine causes autism’ was a classic example of fabricated research. Science corrected itself. What exactly is your point? I just said science is not infallible. Is it so hard to a
RT @paurasmhatre: @KrutiPatel2000 @HARRlS0N_ And while, this is an example of the responsibility in research! Well worded by this account o…
@KrutiPatel2000 @HARRlS0N_ And while, this is an example of the responsibility in research! Well worded by this account on an Instagram story Link in context is: https://t.co/4e2Mj2pdQp https://t.co/myBF80Qr97
Came across this article! Made realise that how much one wrong/rushed research can impact the receptivity to treatment and influence the opinion of providers and patients. https://t.co/E5VfyPtnMV
@MarkBalzAnthony @R_H_Ebright No, but public pressure may be necessary to get a journal to review their decision to publish based on new information. I hope you don’t think that science journals aren’t capable of making mistakes. https://t.co/mIqvVrPwCJ
Remember this? https://t.co/xdppBzrkE3
RT @miq2501: @cutepooodle @sdenta Vaksin MRL bukan? Tapi itupun berdasarkan study yg kurang valid dan artikelnya sudah dikeluarkan dari Jur…