↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Diagnosing acute aortic syndrome: a Canadian clinical practice guideline

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Diagnosing acute aortic syndrome: a Canadian clinical practice guideline
Published in
CMAJ, July 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.200021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Ohle, Justin W. Yan, Krishan Yadav, Alexis Cournoyer, David W. Savage, Prasad Jetty, Rony Atoui, Bindu Bittira, Brock Wilson, Ashish Gupta, Niamh Coffey, Yvonne Callaway, Jeffrey Middaugh, Dominique Ansell, Fraser Rubens, Stephen J. Bignucolo, Terena-Marie Scott, Sarah McIsaac, Eddy Lang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#121,016
of 15,606,628 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#269
of 6,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,262
of 185,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#5
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.