↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 7,134)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
71 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
987 tweeters
facebook
12 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.191707
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean Wharton, David C.W. Lau, Michael Vallis, Arya M. Sharma, Laurent Biertho, Denise Campbell-Scherer, Kristi Adamo, Angela Alberga, Rhonda Bell, Normand Boulé, Elaine Boyling, Jennifer Brown, Betty Calam, Carol Clarke, Lindsay Crowshoe, Dennis Divalentino, Mary Forhan, Yoni Freedhoff, Michel Gagner, Stephen Glazer, Cindy Grand, Michael Green, Margaret Hahn, Raed Hawa, Rita Henderson, Dennis Hong, Pam Hung, Ian Janssen, Kristen Jacklin, Carlene Johnson-Stoklossa, Amy Kemp, Sara Kirk, Jennifer Kuk, Marie-France Langlois, Scott Lear, Ashley McInnes, David Macklin, Leen Naji, Priya Manjoo, Marie-Philippe Morin, Kara Nerenberg, Ian Patton, Sue Pedersen, Leticia Pereira, Helena Piccinini-Vallis, Megha Poddar, Paul Poirier, Denis Prud’homme, Ximena Ramos Salas, Christian Rueda-Clausen, Shelly Russell-Mayhew, Judy Shiau, Diana Sherifali, John Sievenpiper, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Valerie Taylor, Ellen Toth, Laurie Twells, Richard Tytus, Shahebina Walji, Leah Walker, Sonja Wicklum

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 987 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Other 18 11%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 39 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1334. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,958
of 16,263,666 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#6
of 7,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#380
of 300,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,263,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.