↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Prone positioning for patients with hypoxic respiratory failure related to COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
53 tweeters
Title
Prone positioning for patients with hypoxic respiratory failure related to COVID-19
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, November 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.201201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Venus, Laveena Munshi, Michael Fralick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#128,413
of 16,340,420 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#290
of 7,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,658
of 313,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#12
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,340,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.