↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Endocarditis due to Bartonella quintana, the etiological agent of trench fever

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Endocarditis due to Bartonella quintana, the etiological agent of trench fever
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.201170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl Boodman, Terence Wuerz, Philippe Lagacé-Wiens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#82,976
of 16,634,238 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#188
of 7,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,255
of 352,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#8
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,634,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.