↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Don’t use an instrument of oppression as a symbol of diversity and inclusion

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 8,120)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1614 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Don’t use an instrument of oppression as a symbol of diversity and inclusion
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2021
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.80742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sherif Emil

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,614 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1336. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,152
of 20,116,063 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#10
of 8,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326
of 337,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,116,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.