RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @DFisman: Oh my 😂🤣 Please detail the nature of this earlier “quashing”…excited to hear about that! For those interested, the (not quas…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @DFisman: Oh my 😂🤣 Please detail the nature of this earlier “quashing”…excited to hear about that! For those interested, the (not quas…
RT @DFisman: Oh my 😂🤣 Please detail the nature of this earlier “quashing”…excited to hear about that! For those interested, the (not quas…
RT @DFisman: Oh my 😂🤣 Please detail the nature of this earlier “quashing”…excited to hear about that! For those interested, the (not quas…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
RT @jaycurrie: Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments…
Delighted that David Fisman has responded to my thread on his paper. So confident in his position that he restricts comments to people he follows. 1/ https://t.co/RjxyEWi9m8
RT @DFisman: Oh my 😂🤣 Please detail the nature of this earlier “quashing”…excited to hear about that! For those interested, the (not quas…
Oh my 😂🤣 Please detail the nature of this earlier “quashing”…excited to hear about that! For those interested, the (not quashed afaik) paper being referred to can be found here: https://t.co/3TwwgDdGqN
RT @Landon29868131: @ShaunRickard67 His computer model study that was used to claim the vax works and all the unvaxxed are screwed. A math…
RT @Landon29868131: @ShaunRickard67 His computer model study that was used to claim the vax works and all the unvaxxed are screwed. A math…
@ShaunRickard67 His computer model study that was used to claim the vax works and all the unvaxxed are screwed. A mathematical model LOL Got destroyed by peer review. Media of course all printed it as fact. https://t.co/4BGiQD3MaT https://t.co/5O5kdE6yXX
@PedsGeekMD @tim_smock @GidMK EVERY "study" you cited has disqualifying limitations. For example, this one is entirely based on modeling and projections. Not to mention outright fraud. https://t.co/ydef8qoNvp
@rhondaw83330735 WRONG again Unvaccinated spread For Longer and over a period they spread more 👇see this study I’m begging you to at least acknowledge just ONE of these studies I send you. Or you pretending they don’t exist? https://t.co/Krc0tbwpsZ
@FnqSilver @Debunk_the_Funk @TheChiefNerd The contact-adjusted contribution of unvaccinated people to infection risk was disproportionate, with unvaccinated contributing to infections among those who were vaccinated at a rate higher than would have been ex
@CrewElon @CaulfieldTim Perhaps you could post the credible evidence that back Regina's allegations? Because I can't find any. Note that the study period predates Omicron, though mentions it as an emerging variant. Here's the paper which Regina alleges
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
RT @deonandan: This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere…
This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere.) By slowing mixing of vaccinated & unvaccinated populations, risk of breakthrough infections was reduced. [7/17] https://t.co/
@ReginaWatteel The original article: https://t.co/4L4IyJjmOG is biased in favour of gene therapy and has a conclusion which does not logically follow from the reference material [5] and is intensely speculative. An example of pre-revisionism: writing hi
@Boaz_Cohen @ZakovShay @noga_anima @Tl84189427 @meretzparty יש רבים. למשל: https://t.co/poAYRsDCum
@ZakovShay @Boaz_Cohen @noga_anima @Tl84189427 @meretzparty היו כמה כאלה. יש את המחקר הזה למשל: https://t.co/poAYRsDCum
@PennyKuz @colossusPhD @TorontoStar @nadineyousif_ Lol. It’s very apparent that as an anti-vaxxer you don’t value facts/reality. Anti-vaxxers absolutely put others at risk. Study: Impact of population mixing between vaxxed & unvaxxed subpops on infecti
@Jeffstate5 @ryandbusse No, it's not, and that you have to resort to comparing me to Goebbels shows how weak your argument is. https://t.co/bwvZlwFt0p
@Sportsnut15 So a pub full of vaccinated/ post covid and covid negative people that are 30 times less likely to spread the virus is not scientific proof passports work ? I bet you don't even understand the "substantial meal" one either https://t.co/l6Wn
RT @bsd_junkie: @Dunger71 @DejaVu144_ @MarkWar16520311 Well it doesn't really matter because you'll say they are funded by big farmer and t…
@Sadryvale @DejaVu144_ @MarkWar16520311 If you can't be bothered then why post? Very odd behaviour. But I already know that my stats are sponsored by a big farmer and your rumble stats from a drunk are kosha. https://t.co/y3kvNHpEvQ
@Dunger71 @DejaVu144_ @MarkWar16520311 Well it doesn't really matter because you'll say they are funded by big farmer and then you'll post a rumble video of some crackhead in their mum's basement ranting on about it. https://t.co/y3kvNHpEvQ
@fulcrumphase_1 @stopvaccinating @CaulfieldTim Because the risk is much much higher when you’re unvaccinated https://t.co/TclW9oh6Be
@ryangerritsen We can thank that fraud Fisman for that one https://t.co/HmcRd92S5X
@DopplerEffect93 @NukedMouse @SpiderCatNZ @sjs856 Can you answer 3 simple questions Yes or No 1. Do you think Fisman's study had problems? 2. Were the unvaccinated a threat to those who were vaccinated? 3. Confirm you are calling Dr Watteel, phD statis
RT @HealthMusicPerf: @DontVoteSplit @CHEO @OttawaHealth I mean… they do a little. But I hear you. https://t.co/xBVV0AhnEc
RT @HealthMusicPerf: @DontVoteSplit @CHEO @OttawaHealth I mean… they do a little. But I hear you. https://t.co/xBVV0AhnEc
@DontVoteSplit @CHEO @OttawaHealth I mean… they do a little. But I hear you. https://t.co/xBVV0AhnEc
RT @MillyMia8: @urbanmel @1goodtern Agree with most, but it kinda does affect you. An unvaccinated person carries more viral load than a va…
RT @MillyMia8: @urbanmel @1goodtern Agree with most, but it kinda does affect you. An unvaccinated person carries more viral load than a va…
@urbanmel @1goodtern Agree with most, but it kinda does affect you. An unvaccinated person carries more viral load than a vaccinated person. So they are actively promoting & prolonging the pandemic https://t.co/Z9Wi5gjNWm & https://t.co/35EUSdH9qF
@ShaunRickard67 @PardyBruce @rupasubramanya I can't believe this piece of clearly fraudulent "study: is still on the @CMAJ website. https://t.co/DHRFBwnTfp https://t.co/3jYgSYM33R
RT @RickNas95547619: @TheChiefNerd @CaulfieldTim Hey Mr. MISINFORMATION 'EXPERT' https://t.co/njEvkOyQ0e https://t.co/KWm0XY5VBq
RT @pjselby01: @ShaunRickard67 @ReginaWatteel @jordanbpeterson @TuckerCarlson Here's a link to Fisman's fraudulent "study". Yo, @DFisman..…
@ShaunRickard67 @ReginaWatteel @jordanbpeterson @TuckerCarlson Read the replies to Fisman's paper at CMAJ. A lot of academics tore into the paper https://t.co/uYPS2wgmxV