↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Survival and health care costs after inpatient elective surgery: comparison of patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
72 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
20 tweeters
Title
Survival and health care costs after inpatient elective surgery: comparison of patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2023
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.220733
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashwin Sankar, Kevin Thorpe, Daniel I. McIsaac, Jin Luo, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Andrea S. Gershon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 553. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#35,789
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#65
of 8,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#522
of 234,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.