↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Low rates of specialized cancer consultation and cancer-directed therapy for noncurable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Low rates of specialized cancer consultation and cancer-directed therapy for noncurable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis
Published in
CMAJ, May 2019
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.190211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michail N. Mavros, Natalie G. Coburn, Laura E. Davis, Alyson L. Mahar, Ying Liu, Kaitlyn Beyfuss, Sten Myrehaug, Craig C. Earle, Julie Hallet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2019.
All research outputs
#59,415
of 13,092,459 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#140
of 5,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,294
of 168,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#5
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,092,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.