RT @HeckofaLiberal: In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, “no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in…
@SeaTurt1e @MrGamatos @marymaherkane @melmarforeman @PaulMcCartney Holy shit found some more : https://t.co/JsqoBssXDF
@WORandthatD @ChocVader @Andrea73137989 @biomathevan @PackGang2020 @NCSUTechnician Here are some of the studies I was referring to. https://t.co/ihOfHCNG0P https://t.co/YcgnXnHC5H https://t.co/ydlhQByb4F https://t.co/pDtataa09l https://t.co/ehVobznNIq
@eliz_avery @skolsister2017 This kind of research? https://t.co/ksXJf9KD5D
@HardlyRealTom @TimN619 @C_Barraud “We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respirator
@DannyAllenUK @Geoffbagatelos @JamesTodaroMD https://t.co/upsNmLaUGL In real world tests, even N95 respirators don’t protect vs respiratory virus transmission. Some underpowered studies favour N95 respirators but when properly controlled, no effect. Medica
@chrisch31708351 @vicious155 @ClayTravis https://t.co/8Q2mykOXE1 https://t.co/I2ONaxBID8 And just for shits and grins: https://t.co/owUXttgCPc
@W4DFS https://t.co/15gkXuuemw Well, if you wanna go through the data again then that's up to you. But the science is real. So dear, @W4DFS sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up. Your misinformation will and has cost lives.
@hazardscampaign @flowermusickids @DrEricLevi I am looking for the newer one but, hers an old one. Are you working full shifts wearing masks. ? Because the fit testing isntr done even weekly https://t.co/VKGuovDERz
RT @TheRationalMD: @quantizedphoton @VPrasadMDMPH The reason why is there’s a strong body of data & evidence that show that cloth/surgical…
@CNN Strange conclusion when: Vaxx are proving to have safety & effectiveness issues https://t.co/TLSUzRpx45 And Masks are proving to be a maskerade https://t.co/xa7eMchkFl
RT @TheRationalMD: @chrislhayes Dumb analogy. Seatbelts and airbags are proven to work. In contrast, there’s a strong body of data that sho…
RT @TheRationalMD: @chrislhayes Dumb analogy. Seatbelts and airbags are proven to work. In contrast, there’s a strong body of data that sho…
@jwickers @ScottAdamsSays Because cloth/surgical masks worn by people in real world settings do not protect others against airborne viruses. Clearly you haven’t reviewed the robust body of evidence that shows this (including a randomized control trial that
@jwickers @ScottAdamsSays They are political because there is one side (Dems) that gaslights society saying cloth/surgical masks are effective against airborne respiratory viruses spread by aerosolized micro-droplets. There is a robust body of evidence tha
@chrislhayes Dumb analogy. Seatbelts and airbags are proven to work. In contrast, there’s a strong body of data that show cloth/surgical masks are useless against airborne viruses spread by aerosolized micro-droplets: https://t.co/zCwBbLkH75 https://t.co/p
@quantizedphoton @VPrasadMDMPH The reason why is there’s a strong body of data & evidence that show that cloth/surgical masks are useless against airborne viruses spread by aerosolized micro-droplets. Mask mandates are virtue signaling: https://t.co/zC
@patrickyoumans @the_brumby Here are studies that show masks are ineffective at preventing transmission: https://t.co/YeY17lPlcf https://t.co/ThH8nWPnPE https://t.co/ZcziczcZNo https://t.co/ehhm3l533s https://t.co/nT8bc4jjvD https://t.co/I60rqAq3KS https:/
RT @TheRationalMD: @Neoavatara @Noahpinion The evidence would suggest otherwise for aerosolized pathogens: https://t.co/4hIkpqyF84 https:/…
@MJADetBos @Sauna_Guy @mbeck35 @QuintonLucasKC @ZachIsHere I'll make the call, you read these ok? https://t.co/ksXJf9KD5D
@ScottAdamsSays 5 J Smith, C MacDougall. CMAJ. 2016 May 17. 188(8); 567-574. https://t.co/cHyi38idZ1
@mietterose @Waltlaw69 @dmchattie99 @Coo_ray Tough to ignore these as well. https://t.co/gUQECbql6b
@gt62726646 @benshapiro Fact: numerous high quality studies show cloth/surgical masks are ineffective against viruses that are spread via airborne, aerosolized micro-droplets. Cloth masks worn by asymptomatics are for show: https://t.co/zCwBbLkH75 https
@irwills @notacunningplan @mikeosmond @JaseHargreaves @TomHenwood94 @MayorofLondon Most of the far East have been wearing masks on and off for 100 years. HCWs wear masks. Yes lots. https://t.co/psfJKTUWoY https://t.co/aExHAK8pGf https://t.co/Whj4uUDwRB
@YEMolly @telekinetica @ginledford And you aren't? That is funny. Well let's prove each other wrong. I'll read yours, you read all the studies associated with the thread im copying. https://t.co/ksXJf9KD5D
@RadioKate @DaveSmith2024 "In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, influenza-like illness, or reported wor
@hardcastIe @andreeeee95 @MackayIM Actually no, numerous higher quality studies show cloth/surgical masks are ineffective against viruses that are spread via airborne, aerosolized micro-droplets. Cloth masks worn by asymptomatics are for show: https://t.co
@BradfordWiles @sunioc @Suzyolson69 @cadria04 @eddysgirl77 @HelenKennedy @ksorbs Plenty of credible sources in here, not sure what you are talking about. https://t.co/jgv2umWeRY
@sunioc @cadria04 @Suzyolson69 @eddysgirl77 @HelenKennedy @ksorbs I don't know why I would care about that statement. If so, what was your rebuttal to all these studies? https://t.co/jgv2umWeRY
@BobApril @arizman2 @BreitbartNews Gotta love the mata-analysis, am I right? https://t.co/XUqFh9sBMW
RT @AlexDaTravellah: @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Mask Efficacy Studies: https://t.co/o3Xn8ZxR3W https://t.co/ufwIOVAoqG https://t.co/X3gKelKnHk…
RT @AlexDaTravellah: @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Mask Efficacy Studies: https://t.co/o3Xn8ZxR3W https://t.co/ufwIOVAoqG https://t.co/X3gKelKnHk…
@ABriMac https://t.co/h9WnXl7Pnq Selfish or just don’t deny science?
RT @AlexDaTravellah: @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Mask Efficacy Studies: https://t.co/o3Xn8ZxR3W https://t.co/ufwIOVAoqG https://t.co/X3gKelKnHk…
RT @AlexDaTravellah: @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Mask Efficacy Studies: https://t.co/o3Xn8ZxR3W https://t.co/ufwIOVAoqG https://t.co/X3gKelKnHk…
RT @AlexDaTravellah: @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Mask Efficacy Studies: https://t.co/o3Xn8ZxR3W https://t.co/ufwIOVAoqG https://t.co/X3gKelKnHk…
RT @AlexDaTravellah: @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Mask Efficacy Studies: https://t.co/o3Xn8ZxR3W https://t.co/ufwIOVAoqG https://t.co/X3gKelKnHk…
RT @AlexDaTravellah: @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Mask Efficacy Studies: https://t.co/o3Xn8ZxR3W https://t.co/ufwIOVAoqG https://t.co/X3gKelKnHk…
RT @AlexDaTravellah: @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Mask Efficacy Studies: https://t.co/o3Xn8ZxR3W https://t.co/ufwIOVAoqG https://t.co/X3gKelKnHk…
@ashishkjha @Becca_Rausch @WHO @BostonGlobe 5 J Smith, C MacDougall. CMAJ. 2016 May 17. 188(8); 567-574 https://t.co/YxEqU2cnoG
RT @jhsmith156: Now @SadiqKhan and @Telegraph please retract your misinformation immediately @Ofcom https://t.co/IWlw5g7COq
@D16584667 @pawel_tomal @AndrewGraystone Here is a study looking at surgical masks vs n95 https://t.co/cLYaSLikfY
@_bailive_ @colinmcfarlane https://t.co/CRSYMAzWUS “We found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place a
@KatieSalisbur11 @Glen_Maney @LBC @IainDale Katie you absolute dipshit. Here’s 19 peer reviewed studies on why cloth/surgical face masks are useless and unnecessary. https://t.co/gBDko8x36w https://t.co/PF6foORsYh https://t.co/XKbBnYoedE https://t.co/
@introvertedme3 @Pawlewski @FatEmperor https://t.co/nENaduQ4Uk In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection
RT @Shawn_Samuel21: @JeremyAlpha @CryptoCharles__ Sure mate. Here 👇 Study 1 (RCT): https://t.co/IQ15WBCFh5 Study 2 (Systematic review): h…
@bliz14704763 @NancyJo85407186 @eric_hurwitz @SFbrian415 @sfchronicle Not quite. There's far more than this "one lawsuit" https://t.co/zNz6ZuLDW5 https://t.co/0rI6ham4W8 https://t.co/xt9JaDSE72 https://t.co/AAl9BTVmcC https://t.co/40aWuMTeuY If masks
@Reed_LikeABook @fill_adam777 @ManninoCourtney @Breaking911 No conclusion found https://t.co/XAQ2ESfSGT
@ScottAdamsSays Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016 https://t.co/Cxf4YlsWVl
@ksorbsinnrvoice @kenneysclown @troutwhispers https://t.co/DJLmAmsamX "no significant difference in risk of influenza-like illness between N95 respirators and surgical masks" https://t.co/uZmxBAWvUR "None of the studies established a conclusive relationsh
@vee_terra @calgaryherald And nothing to learn from science? Many studies refute the efficacy of masks: https://t.co/kgE5MZD9GO https://t.co/Ldv3E6VcE2 https://t.co/GVsEbRyIdL https://t.co/3EgcJ1XBTv https://t.co/DJLmAmsamX https://t.co/uZmxBAWvUR h
@officematt2002 You assume that masks are effective, but many studies show otherwise. It's not about selfishness, it's about SCIENCE: https://t.co/kgE5MZD9GO https://t.co/Ldv3E6VcE2 https://t.co/GVsEbRyIdL https://t.co/3EgcJ1XBTv https://t.co/DJLmAmsa
@kenneysclown @troutwhispers You assume that masks are effective, but many studies show otherwise. It's not about selfishness, it's about SCIENCE: https://t.co/kgE5MZD9GO https://t.co/Ldv3E6VcE2 https://t.co/GVsEbRyIdL https://t.co/3EgcJ1XBTv https://
@C_Siemering J Smith, C MacDougall. CMAJ. 2016 May 17. 188(8); 567-574. https://t.co/EwKWQipznJ
RT @Doc_MediFacts: @pavel23 So ein unwissenschaftlicher Käse. Bitte fangen Sie mal an Studien zu lesen. Für FFP2 Masken ist die Evidenz ext…
RT @Doc_MediFacts: @pavel23 So ein unwissenschaftlicher Käse. Bitte fangen Sie mal an Studien zu lesen. Für FFP2 Masken ist die Evidenz ext…
RT @wkholle: Hinzu kommt noch, wenn FFP-Masken nicht sachgemäß genutzt werden. Was in der Mehrheit der Fälle bei "Normalnutzern" der Fall s…
Hinzu kommt noch, wenn FFP-Masken nicht sachgemäß genutzt werden. Was in der Mehrheit der Fälle bei "Normalnutzern" der Fall sein dürfte.
RT @Doc_MediFacts: @pavel23 So ein unwissenschaftlicher Käse. Bitte fangen Sie mal an Studien zu lesen. Für FFP2 Masken ist die Evidenz ext…
@pavel23 So ein unwissenschaftlicher Käse. Bitte fangen Sie mal an Studien zu lesen. Für FFP2 Masken ist die Evidenz extrem schlecht, der Effekt nahezu null. Unter anderem hier https://t.co/RXWjsNbS9K und hier https://t.co/QhDIR59Lhu.
RT @HeckofaLiberal: In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, “no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in…
@mjstilwell @2bczar4u @JamesManson6263 @MeltingFast https://t.co/Gry9KPWAXC does not include how the viri tested transmit
@marymetal5 @sourIpatchIkid @stillgray @AceHardware 2008: https://t.co/lLaF3Bb8ZI 2009: https://t.co/tBuLum42y0 2010: https://t.co/3RQ5daTWCS 2012: https://t.co/pvGjl7H397 2015: https://t.co/9kz9PUStRs 2016: https://t.co/vKvqJwZhJQ 2017: https://t.co/ACNQz
@Bill_63 @jbtodd30 @bmccul3 @get_involved1 @toadmeister How do you know whether it is fake news or not if you didn't open it? Twitter doesn't want people learning the truth which is why they censor Daily Expose. It contains multiple links. This is just one
RT @FineTunedFoto: 19. Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infe…
@mtnkkr_ @sixersliydim https://t.co/jLhB0WyIwh yenilere ısmarlama dendiği için özellikle eskileri atıyorum https://t.co/dMBos23tky https://t.co/qWkQtTqbZv https://t.co/vrVMByEJi8 https://t.co/fAKkFBWRuh https://t.co/ncmKhnT4jy
@JoshuaBHoe @JoshSather @nickiclyne https://t.co/emMyotaxtz https://t.co/yEXoSnWE7A https://t.co/unbs8FyGRR https://t.co/xoDrluQnto That's why we are justified in mocking 🤷🏼♂️ But, yes, anyone has the right to choose to wear or not wear their own, perso
@jeffreyatucker The guidelines are meat to ostracize. Obviously not protect, maybe, harm. Surgical masks protect others more than the wearer, yet, a definitive answer to the question 'can vaccinated people still spread COVID-19' is unknown/maybe. https:/