↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Poor health workforce planning is costly, risky and inequitable

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
126 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Poor health workforce planning is costly, risky and inequitable
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.191241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivy Bourgeault, Sarah Simkin, Caroline Chamberland-Rowe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 24%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#422,716
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#740
of 9,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,226
of 373,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#17
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.