↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Life-threatening bronchiolitis related to electronic cigarette use in a Canadian youth

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 6,415)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
109 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
193 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Life-threatening bronchiolitis related to electronic cigarette use in a Canadian youth
Published in
CMAJ, November 2019
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.191402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon T. Landman, Inderdeep Dhaliwal, Constance A. Mackenzie, Tereza Martinu, Andrew Steele, Karen J. Bosma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 193 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1012. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,134
of 13,996,779 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#6
of 6,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165
of 218,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#1
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,996,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.