↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Living donor liver transplant between physicians: two viewpoints

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
87 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Living donor liver transplant between physicians: two viewpoints
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, June 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.200231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J Stewart, Marie E Faughnan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#715,202
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,122
of 9,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,571
of 434,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#31
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.