↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Article Metrics

Effect of moist heat reprocessing of N95 respirators on SARS-CoV-2 inactivation and respirator function

Overview of attention for article published in CMAJ, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
8 Redditors
Title
Effect of moist heat reprocessing of N95 respirators on SARS-CoV-2 inactivation and respirator function
Published in
CMAJ, July 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.201203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simeon C. Daeschler, Niclas Manson, Kariym Joachim, Alex W.H. Chin, Katelyn Chan, Paul Z. Chen, Aaron Jones, Kiana Tajdaran, Kaveh Mirmoeini, Jennifer J. Zhang, Jason T. Maynes, Libo Zhang, Michelle Science, Ali Darbandi, Derek Stephens, Frank Gu, Leo L.M. Poon, Gregory H. Borschel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#90,707
of 15,636,961 outputs
Outputs from CMAJ
#204
of 6,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,489
of 186,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CMAJ
#4
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,636,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.