| Title |
Recognizing and addressing implicit gender bias in medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.200286 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrina Hui, Javeed Sukhera, Simone Vigod, Valerie H Taylor, Juveria Zaheer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 72 | 47% |
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Djibouti | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 56 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 43% |
| Scientists | 43 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#404,916
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#707
of 9,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,685
of 440,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#21
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.